Machenike 87 vs Machenike 87-Key
The short answer
It's a close call: Machenike 87 / Machenike 87-Key both land at 56/100.
Scores are computed from 4 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Logitech MX Keys S
Razer BlackWidow V4 Pro
Aula F99
MCHOSE G75 Pro
Lofree -68
B.FRIENDit K23
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Design2▾
| Machenike 87 | Machenike 87-Key | |
|---|---|---|
| Layout | 笔记本式 | 笔记本式 |
| Key count | 87 | 87 |
Connect1▾
| Machenike 87 | Machenike 87-Key | |
|---|---|---|
| 2.4GHz wireless | — | — |
Feel1▾
| Machenike 87 | Machenike 87-Key | |
|---|---|---|
| Switch type | 机械轴（凯华黑轴） | 机械轴（凯华黑轴） |
FAQ
Which is better, Machenike 87 or Machenike 87-Key?
It's a close call: Machenike 87 / Machenike 87-Key both land at 56/100.
What are the main differences?
Scores are computed from 4 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 4 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.