MCHOSE G75 V2 vs Centauri60/80 Hall Effect Gaming Keyboard
MCHOSE G75 V2 — Pick the MCHOSE G75 V2 — it leads these groups: Design 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
MCHOSE G75 V2 wins this comparison with a score of 69/100, ahead of Centauri60/80 Hall Effect Gaming Keyboard (67).
The main differences: Layout (75%配列 vs QWERTY) · Key count (75 vs 68) · Switch type (冰蓝轴 vs Mechanical).
Scores are computed from 7 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the MCHOSE G75 V2 if you care about…
- Key count 75 +7 vs 68
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Logitech MX Keys S
Razer BlackWidow V4 Pro
Aula F99
MCHOSE G75 Pro
Lofree -68
B.FRIENDit K23
Where they differ
3 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| MCHOSE G75 V2 | Centauri60/80 Hall Effect Gaming Keyboard | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Layout | 75%配列 | QWERTY | Depends |
| Key count | 75 | 68 | MCHOSE G75 V2 |
| Switch type | 冰蓝轴 | Mechanical | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Design4▾
| MCHOSE G75 V2 | Centauri60/80 Hall Effect Gaming Keyboard | |
|---|---|---|
| Layout | 75%配列 | QWERTY |
| Hot-swappable | — | ✓ |
| Per-key RGB | — | ✓ |
| Key count | 75 | 68 |
Connect2▾
| MCHOSE G75 V2 | Centauri60/80 Hall Effect Gaming Keyboard | |
|---|---|---|
| Wired | — | ✓ |
| 2.4GHz wireless | ✓ | — |
Feel1▾
| MCHOSE G75 V2 | Centauri60/80 Hall Effect Gaming Keyboard | |
|---|---|---|
| Switch type | 冰蓝轴 | Mechanical |
Data sources: Amazon · GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, MCHOSE G75 V2 or Centauri60/80 Hall Effect Gaming Keyboard?
MCHOSE G75 V2 edges ahead 69 to 67 and leads in Design.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Layout (75%配列 vs QWERTY) · Key count (75 vs 68) · Switch type (冰蓝轴 vs Mechanical).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 7 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.