MS Mississippi State University vs MO Missouri State University-Springfield
MS Mississippi State University — Pick the MS Mississippi State University — it leads these groups: Cost & outcomes 4 Admissions 2 Students & campus 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
MS Mississippi State University wins this comparison with a score of 46/100, ahead of MO Missouri State University-Springfield (43).
The main differences: Acceptance rate (77.6 % vs 90.5 %) · Average SAT (1219 vs 1122) · Average ACT (26 vs 23).
Scores are computed from 12 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| MS Mississippi State University | MO Missouri State University-Springfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Admissions | 58 | 53 |
| Cost & outcomes | 53 | 53 |
| Students & campus | 11 | 8 |
How to choose
Pick the MS Mississippi State University if you care about…
- Average SAT 1219 +97 vs 1122
- Average ACT 26 +3 vs 23
- Median earnings (10 yr) 51513 USD +1686 USD vs 49827 USD
- Earnings >$50k (10 yr) 74.5 % +1.3 % vs 73.2 %
Pick the MO Missouri State University-Springfield if you care about…
- Acceptance rate 90.5 % +12.9 % vs 77.6 %
- In-state tuition 9502 USD/yr +700 USD/yr vs 10202 USD/yr
- Out-of-state tuition 18770 USD/yr +8867 USD/yr vs 27637 USD/yr
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Where they differ
11 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| MS Mississippi State University | MO Missouri State University-Springfield | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acceptance rate | 77.6 % | 90.5 % | MO Missouri State University-Springfield |
| Average SAT | 1219 | 1122 | MS Mississippi State University |
| Average ACT | 26 | 23 | MS Mississippi State University |
| In-state tuition | 10202 USD/yr | 9502 USD/yr | MO Missouri State University-Springfield |
| Out-of-state tuition | 27637 USD/yr | 18770 USD/yr | MO Missouri State University-Springfield |
| Median earnings (10 yr) | 51513 USD | 49827 USD | MS Mississippi State University |
| Earnings >$50k (10 yr) | 74.5 % | 73.2 % | MS Mississippi State University |
| Graduation rate (150%) | 66.7 % | 57.9 % | MS Mississippi State University |
| Freshman retention | 82.5 % | 77.2 % | MS Mississippi State University |
| Undergraduate students | 18397 | 13313 | MS Mississippi State University |
| Campus setting | Town | City | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Admissions3▾
| MS Mississippi State University | MO Missouri State University-Springfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptance rate | 77.6 % | 90.5 % |
| Average SAT | 1219 | 1122 |
| Average ACT | 26 | 23 |
Cost & outcomes6▾
| MS Mississippi State University | MO Missouri State University-Springfield | |
|---|---|---|
| In-state tuition | 10202 USD/yr | 9502 USD/yr |
| Out-of-state tuition | 27637 USD/yr | 18770 USD/yr |
| Median earnings (10 yr) | 51513 USD | 49827 USD |
| Earnings >$50k (10 yr) | 74.5 % | 73.2 % |
| Graduation rate (150%) | 66.7 % | 57.9 % |
| Freshman retention | 82.5 % | 77.2 % |
Students & campus3▾
| MS Mississippi State University | MO Missouri State University-Springfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Undergraduate students | 18397 | 13313 |
| Campus setting | Town | City |
| Ownership | Public | Public |
Data sources: College Scorecard
FAQ
Which is better, MS Mississippi State University or MO Missouri State University-Springfield?
MS Mississippi State University has the higher overall score (46 vs 43) and leads in Cost & outcomes, Admissions, Students & campus. Choose MO Missouri State University-Springfield instead if Acceptance rate matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Acceptance rate (77.6 % vs 90.5 %) · Average SAT (1219 vs 1122) · Average ACT (26 vs 23).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 12 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.