EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

Motorola Signature 27 vs Nothing CMF Phone 1

🏆 Settled

Motorola Signature 27 — Pick the Motorola Signature 27 — it leads these groups: Display 3 Battery 3 Performance 2

Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public

The short answer

Motorola Signature 27 wins this comparison with a score of 42/100, ahead of Nothing CMF Phone 1 (39).

The main differences: Screen size (6.8 in vs 6.7 in) · Refresh rate (165 Hz vs 120 Hz) · Pixel density (449 ppi vs 395 ppi).

Scores are computed from 25 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

🏆 Overall winner Motorola Signature 27

Motorola Signature 27

Motorola
42score / 100
9 wins · 12 tied
Nothing CMF Phone 1

Nothing CMF Phone 1

Nothing
39score / 100
1 win · 20 tied

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

Motorola Signature 27Nothing CMF Phone 1
Display 34 24
Battery 56 16
Performance 55 32
Camera 47 22
Design 73 73
Memory 0 100
Platform 9 9
Features 50 50

How to choose

Pick the Motorola Signature 27 if you care about…

  • Screen size 6.8 in +0.1 in vs 6.7 in
  • Refresh rate 165 Hz +45 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Pixel density 449 ppi +54 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Battery capacity 7000 mAh +2000 mAh vs 5000 mAh

Pick the Nothing CMF Phone 1 if you care about…

  • Memory card slot ✓ vs —

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

14 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

Motorola Signature 27Nothing CMF Phone 1Where they differ
Screen size 6.8 in6.7 in Motorola Signature 27
Refresh rate 165 Hz120 Hz Motorola Signature 27
Pixel density 449 ppi395 ppi Motorola Signature 27
Display type LTPO AMOLEDAMOLED Depends
Battery capacity 7000 mAh5000 mAh Motorola Signature 27
Wired charging 90 W33 W Motorola Signature 27
Wireless charging ✓— Motorola Signature 27
RAM 12 GB6 GB Motorola Signature 27
Chipset Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6Dimensity 7300 Depends
OS Android 17Android 14 Depends
Storage 256 GB128 GB Motorola Signature 27
Selfie camera 50 MP16 MP Motorola Signature 27
Colors Pantone: Coal Smoke, Capulet OliveBlack, Orange, Light Green Depends
Memory card slot —✓ Nothing CMF Phone 1

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Display5▾
Motorola Signature 27Nothing CMF Phone 1
Screen size 6.8 in 6.7 in
Peak brightness — 2000 nits
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Pixel density 449 ppi 395 ppi
Display type LTPO AMOLED AMOLED
Battery4▾
Motorola Signature 27Nothing CMF Phone 1
Battery capacity 7000 mAh 5000 mAh
Wired charging 90 W 33 W
Wireless charging power 50 W —
Wireless charging ✓ —
Performance4▾
Motorola Signature 27Nothing CMF Phone 1
RAM 12 GB 6 GB
Chipset Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 Dimensity 7300
OS Android 17 Android 14
Storage 256 GB 128 GB
Camera2▾
Motorola Signature 27Nothing CMF Phone 1
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Selfie camera 50 MP 16 MP
Design6▾
Motorola Signature 27Nothing CMF Phone 1
Weight — 202 g
Thickness — 8.2 mm
Water resistant (IP68) ✓ —
Length — 164 mm
Width — 77 mm
Colors Pantone: Coal Smoke, Capulet Olive Black, Orange, Light Green
Memory1▾
Motorola Signature 27Nothing CMF Phone 1
Memory card slot — ✓
Platform1▾
Motorola Signature 27Nothing CMF Phone 1
CPU cores — 8
Features2▾
Motorola Signature 27Nothing CMF Phone 1
Face unlock — —
Fingerprint sensor ✓ ✓

Data sources: GSMArena

FAQ

Which is better, Motorola Signature 27 or Nothing CMF Phone 1?

Motorola Signature 27 has the higher overall score (42 vs 39) and leads in Display, Battery, Performance. Choose Nothing CMF Phone 1 instead if Memory card slot matters more to you.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Screen size (6.8 in vs 6.7 in) · Refresh rate (165 Hz vs 120 Hz) · Pixel density (449 ppi vs 395 ppi).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 25 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.