UT Neumont College of Computer Science vs NJ New Jersey Institute of Technology
NJ New Jersey Institute of Technology — Pick the NJ New Jersey Institute of Technology — it leads these groups: Cost & outcomes 4 Students & campus 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
NJ New Jersey Institute of Technology wins this comparison with a score of 48/100, ahead of UT Neumont College of Computer Science (45).
The main differences: Acceptance rate (86.8 % vs 65.1 %) · Average SAT (1093 vs 1337) · In-state tuition (27360 USD/yr vs 19974 USD/yr).
Scores are computed from 12 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| UT Neumont College of Computer Science | NJ New Jersey Institute of Technology | |
|---|---|---|
| Admissions | 60 | 67 |
| Cost & outcomes | 55 | 56 |
| Students & campus | 0 | 6 |
How to choose
Pick the UT Neumont College of Computer Science if you care about…
- Acceptance rate 86.8 % +21.7 % vs 65.1 %
- Out-of-state tuition 27360 USD/yr +10304 USD/yr vs 37664 USD/yr
- Median earnings (10 yr) 97827 USD +13551 USD vs 84276 USD
Pick the NJ New Jersey Institute of Technology if you care about…
- Average SAT 1337 +244 vs 1093
- In-state tuition 19974 USD/yr +7386 USD/yr vs 27360 USD/yr
- Earnings >$50k (10 yr) 86.4 % +2.9 % vs 83.5 %
- Graduation rate (150%) 72.8 % +10.1 % vs 62.7 %
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Where they differ
10 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| UT Neumont College of Computer Science | NJ New Jersey Institute of Technology | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acceptance rate | 86.8 % | 65.1 % | UT Neumont College of Computer Science |
| Average SAT | 1093 | 1337 | NJ New Jersey Institute of Technology |
| In-state tuition | 27360 USD/yr | 19974 USD/yr | NJ New Jersey Institute of Technology |
| Out-of-state tuition | 27360 USD/yr | 37664 USD/yr | UT Neumont College of Computer Science |
| Median earnings (10 yr) | 97827 USD | 84276 USD | UT Neumont College of Computer Science |
| Earnings >$50k (10 yr) | 83.5 % | 86.4 % | NJ New Jersey Institute of Technology |
| Graduation rate (150%) | 62.7 % | 72.8 % | NJ New Jersey Institute of Technology |
| Freshman retention | 74.0 % | 89.5 % | NJ New Jersey Institute of Technology |
| Undergraduate students | 453 | 9019 | NJ New Jersey Institute of Technology |
| Ownership | Private for-profit | Public | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Admissions3▾
| UT Neumont College of Computer Science | NJ New Jersey Institute of Technology | |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptance rate | 86.8 % | 65.1 % |
| Average SAT | 1093 | 1337 |
| Average ACT | — | 30 |
Cost & outcomes6▾
| UT Neumont College of Computer Science | NJ New Jersey Institute of Technology | |
|---|---|---|
| In-state tuition | 27360 USD/yr | 19974 USD/yr |
| Out-of-state tuition | 27360 USD/yr | 37664 USD/yr |
| Median earnings (10 yr) | 97827 USD | 84276 USD |
| Earnings >$50k (10 yr) | 83.5 % | 86.4 % |
| Graduation rate (150%) | 62.7 % | 72.8 % |
| Freshman retention | 74.0 % | 89.5 % |
Students & campus3▾
| UT Neumont College of Computer Science | NJ New Jersey Institute of Technology | |
|---|---|---|
| Undergraduate students | 453 | 9019 |
| Campus setting | City | City |
| Ownership | Private for-profit | Public |
Data sources: College Scorecard
FAQ
Which is better, UT Neumont College of Computer Science or NJ New Jersey Institute of Technology?
NJ New Jersey Institute of Technology has the higher overall score (48 vs 45) and leads in Cost & outcomes, Students & campus. Choose UT Neumont College of Computer Science instead if Acceptance rate matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Acceptance rate (86.8 % vs 65.1 %) · Average SAT (1093 vs 1337) · In-state tuition (27360 USD/yr vs 19974 USD/yr).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 12 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.