Newmen XM-K33 vs NuPhy Air75 V2
NuPhy Air75 V2 — Pick the NuPhy Air75 V2 — it leads these groups: Connect 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
NuPhy Air75 V2 wins this comparison with a score of 75/100, ahead of Newmen XM-K33 (56).
The main differences: Layout (全尺寸式 vs 75%) · Key count (104 vs 84) · 2.4GHz wireless (— vs ✓).
Scores are computed from 11 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Newmen XM-K33 if you care about…
- Key count 104 +20 vs 84
Pick the NuPhy Air75 V2 if you care about…
- 2.4GHz wireless ✓ vs —
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Where they differ
4 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Newmen XM-K33 | NuPhy Air75 V2 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Layout | 全尺寸式 | 75% | Depends |
| Key count | 104 | 84 | Newmen XM-K33 |
| 2.4GHz wireless | — | ✓ | NuPhy Air75 V2 |
| Switch type | 火山口架构 | Gateron low-profile 2.0 | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Design5▾
| Newmen XM-K33 | NuPhy Air75 V2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Layout | 全尺寸式 | 75% |
| Hot-swappable | — | ✓ |
| Per-key RGB | — | ✓ |
| Key count | 104 | 84 |
| Weight | — | 580 g |
Connect3▾
| Newmen XM-K33 | NuPhy Air75 V2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Wired | — | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | — | ✓ |
| 2.4GHz wireless | — | ✓ |
Feel1▾
| Newmen XM-K33 | NuPhy Air75 V2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Switch type | 火山口架构 | Gateron low-profile 2.0 |
Battery1▾
| Newmen XM-K33 | NuPhy Air75 V2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | — | 960 h |
Value1▾
| Newmen XM-K33 | NuPhy Air75 V2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | — | 140 USD |
Data sources: ZOL
FAQ
Which is better, Newmen XM-K33 or NuPhy Air75 V2?
NuPhy Air75 V2 has the higher overall score (75 vs 56) and leads in Connect. Choose Newmen XM-K33 instead if Key count matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Layout (全尺寸式 vs 75%) · Key count (104 vs 84) · 2.4GHz wireless (— vs ✓).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 11 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.
Logitech MX Keys S
Razer BlackWidow V4 Pro
Aula F99
MCHOSE G75 Pro
Lofree -68
B.FRIENDit K23