EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

Lofree PETAL vs EM01 NL Trackball Ergonomic Mouse

🏆 Settled

EM01 NL Trackball Ergonomic Mouse — Pick the EM01 NL Trackball Ergonomic Mouse — it leads these groups: Performance 1 Design 1

Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public

The short answer

EM01 NL Trackball Ergonomic Mouse wins this comparison with a score of 54/100, ahead of Lofree PETAL (37).

The main differences: Weight (85 g vs 2.4 g) · Buttons (5 vs 6).

Scores are computed from 7 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

Lofree PETAL

Lofree
37score / 100
0 wins · 6 tied
🏆 Overall winner EM01 NL Trackball Ergonomic Mouse

EM01 NL Trackball Ergonomic Mouse

ProtoArc
54score / 100
2 wins · 4 tied

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

Lofree PETALEM01 NL Trackball Ergonomic Mouse
Performance 24 77
Design 15 33
Connect 64 68

How to choose

Pick the EM01 NL Trackball Ergonomic Mouse if you care about…

  • Weight 2.4 g +82.6 g vs 85 g
  • Buttons 6 +1 vs 5

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

2 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

Lofree PETALEM01 NL Trackball Ergonomic MouseWhere they differ
Weight 85 g2.4 g EM01 NL Trackball Ergonomic Mouse
Buttons 56 EM01 NL Trackball Ergonomic Mouse

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Performance3▾
Lofree PETALEM01 NL Trackball Ergonomic Mouse
Max DPI 3200 DPI —
Sensor — Trackball
Weight 85 g 2.4 g
Design2▾
Lofree PETALEM01 NL Trackball Ergonomic Mouse
Buttons 5 6
RGB lighting — —
Connect2▾
Lofree PETALEM01 NL Trackball Ergonomic Mouse
Wired — —
2.4GHz wireless ✓ —

Data sources: Amazon

FAQ

Which is better, Lofree PETAL or EM01 NL Trackball Ergonomic Mouse?

EM01 NL Trackball Ergonomic Mouse has the higher overall score (54 vs 37) and leads in Performance, Design.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Weight (85 g vs 2.4 g) · Buttons (5 vs 6).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 7 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.