Philips 24M1N5500Z vs Philips 27B2N3500G
The short answer
Philips 27B2N3500G wins this comparison with a score of 61.3/100, ahead of Philips 24M1N5500Z (61.1).
The main differences: Screen size (23.8 in vs 27 in) · Max refresh rate (165 Hz vs 144 Hz) · Weight (with stand) (3000 g vs 3980 g).
Scores are computed from 5 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| Philips 24M1N5500Z | Philips 27B2N3500G | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 40 | 41 |
| Ergonomics | 87 | 86 |
How to choose
Pick the Philips 24M1N5500Z if you care about…
- Max refresh rate 165 Hz +21 Hz vs 144 Hz
- Weight (with stand) 3000 g +980 g vs 3980 g
Pick the Philips 27B2N3500G if you care about…
- Screen size 27 in +3.2 in vs 23.8 in
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
GIGABYTE M27Q
MSI Optix MAG274QRF
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
LG UltraFine 27UL500
BENQ EW3270U
Where they differ
3 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Philips 24M1N5500Z | Philips 27B2N3500G | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 23.8 in | 27 in | Philips 27B2N3500G |
| Max refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz | Philips 24M1N5500Z |
| Weight (with stand) | 3000 g | 3980 g | Philips 24M1N5500Z |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display4▾
| Philips 24M1N5500Z | Philips 27B2N3500G | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 23.8 in | 27 in |
| Resolution | 2560x1440 | 2560x1440 |
| Max refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
Ergonomics1▾
| Philips 24M1N5500Z | Philips 27B2N3500G | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (with stand) | 3000 g | 3980 g |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Philips 24M1N5500Z or Philips 27B2N3500G?
Philips 27B2N3500G edges ahead 61 to 61. Choose Philips 24M1N5500Z instead if Max refresh rate matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (23.8 in vs 27 in) · Max refresh rate (165 Hz vs 144 Hz) · Weight (with stand) (3000 g vs 3980 g).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 5 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.