EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →

Philips 3000i AC2887vsPhilips 3000i AC3829

🏆 Settled

Philips 3000i AC2887 — Pick the Philips 3000i AC2887 — it leads these groups: Performance 2

Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public

🏆 Overall winner Philips 3000i AC2887

Philips 3000i AC2887

Philips
47score / 100
2 wins · 8 tied View on Amazon →
Philips 3000i AC3829

Philips 3000i AC3829

Philips
46score / 100
1 wins · 9 tied View on Amazon →

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

Philips 3000i AC2887Philips 3000i AC3829
Performance 46 42
Noise 74 0
Smart 100 100
Design 0 0
Efficiency 0 41

How to choose

Pick the Philips 3000i AC2887 if you care about…

  • CADR (particles) 333 m³/h +23 m³/h vs 310 m³/h
  • Max room area 86 m² +6 m² vs 80 m²

Pick the Philips 3000i AC3829 if you care about…

  • Power 45 W +15 W vs 60 W

Best price now

Philips 3000i AC2887 Amazon
Philips 3000i AC3829 Amazon

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

3 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

Philips 3000i AC2887Philips 3000i AC3829Where they differ
CADR (particles) 333 m³/h310 m³/h Philips 3000i AC2887
Max room area 86 m²80 m² Philips 3000i AC2887
Power 60 W45 W Philips 3000i AC3829

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Performance3
Philips 3000i AC2887Philips 3000i AC3829
CADR (particles) 333 m³/h 310 m³/h
Max room area 86 m² 80 m²
Filtration efficiency 100.0 % 100.0 %
Noise2
Philips 3000i AC2887Philips 3000i AC3829
Noise level 55 dB
Noise (night) 19 dB
Smart3
Philips 3000i AC2887Philips 3000i AC3829
Wi-Fi connected
PM2.5 sensor
Automatic mode
Design1
Philips 3000i AC2887Philips 3000i AC3829
Fan speeds 3 3
Efficiency1
Philips 3000i AC2887Philips 3000i AC3829
Power 60 W 45 W