EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →

Philips 3000i AC3829vsPhilips PureProtect Mini 900

🏆 Settled

Philips PureProtect Mini 900 — Pick the Philips PureProtect Mini 900 — it leads these groups: Efficiency 1

Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public

Philips 3000i AC3829

Philips 3000i AC3829

Philips
46score / 100
2 wins · 8 tied View on Amazon →
🏆 Overall winner Philips PureProtect Mini 900

Philips PureProtect Mini 900

Philips
76score / 100
1 wins · 9 tied View on Amazon →

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

Philips 3000i AC3829Philips PureProtect Mini 900
Performance 42 30
Noise 0 96
Smart 100 100
Design 0 0
Efficiency 41 100

How to choose

Pick the Philips 3000i AC3829 if you care about…

  • CADR (particles) 310 m³/h +60 m³/h vs 250 m³/h
  • Max room area 80 m² +15 m² vs 65 m²

Pick the Philips PureProtect Mini 900 if you care about…

  • Power 23 W +22 W vs 45 W

Best price now

Philips 3000i AC3829 Amazon
Philips PureProtect Mini 900 Amazon

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

3 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

Philips 3000i AC3829Philips PureProtect Mini 900Where they differ
CADR (particles) 310 m³/h250 m³/h Philips 3000i AC3829
Max room area 80 m²65 m² Philips 3000i AC3829
Power 45 W23 W Philips PureProtect Mini 900

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Performance3
Philips 3000i AC3829Philips PureProtect Mini 900
CADR (particles) 310 m³/h 250 m³/h
Max room area 80 m² 65 m²
Filtration efficiency 100.0 % 100.0 %
Noise2
Philips 3000i AC3829Philips PureProtect Mini 900
Noise level 49 dB
Noise (night) 20.5 dB
Smart3
Philips 3000i AC3829Philips PureProtect Mini 900
Wi-Fi connected
PM2.5 sensor
Automatic mode
Design1
Philips 3000i AC3829Philips PureProtect Mini 900
Fan speeds 3
Efficiency1
Philips 3000i AC3829Philips PureProtect Mini 900
Power 45 W 23 W