Philips PUS8809 55vsSamsung Q80D 55
🏆 Settled
Samsung Q80D 55 — Pick the Samsung Q80D 55 — it leads these groups: Display 1 Design 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| Philips PUS8809 55 | Samsung Q80D 55 | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 36 | 64 |
| Smart | 100 | 100 |
| Connectivity | 100 | 100 |
| Design | 4 | 50 |
How to choose
Pick the Samsung Q80D 55 if you care about…
- Native refresh rate 100 Hz +40 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Weight (with stand) 19800 g +5600 g vs 25400 g
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Hisense U6N 65
Hisense U6N 55
TCL P755 50
TCL P755 55
TCL C645 65
TCL C645 55
Where they differ
3 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Philips PUS8809 55 | Samsung Q80D 55 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Native refresh rate | 60 Hz | 100 Hz | Samsung Q80D 55 |
| Smart TV platform | Android TV | Tizen | Depends |
| Weight (with stand) | 25400 g | 19800 g | Samsung Q80D 55 |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| Philips PUS8809 55 | Samsung Q80D 55 | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 55 in | 55 in |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels |
| Native refresh rate | 60 Hz | 100 Hz |
| Brightness | 450 cd/m² | |
| HDR support | ✓ |
Smart2▾
| Philips PUS8809 55 | Samsung Q80D 55 | |
|---|---|---|
| Smart TV | ✓ | ✓ |
| Smart TV platform | Android TV | Tizen |
Connectivity2▾
| Philips PUS8809 55 | Samsung Q80D 55 | |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 4 | 4 |
| Ethernet LAN | ✓ | ✓ |
Design2▾
| Philips PUS8809 55 | Samsung Q80D 55 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (with stand) | 25400 g | 19800 g |
| Energy per 1000 h | 77 kWh |