Razer Habu vs Razer BasiliskV3
The short answer
Razer BasiliskV3 wins this comparison with a score of 45/100, ahead of Razer Habu (44).
Scores are computed from 6 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| Razer Habu | Razer BasiliskV3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 63 | 46 |
| Design | 33 | 74 |
| Connect | 32 | 32 |
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Razer Viper V3 Pro
Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2
Zowie EC2-CW
Glorious Model I 2
Pulsar X2V2 Mini
Logitech MX Master 3S
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Performance3▾
| Razer Habu | Razer BasiliskV3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | — | 26000 DPI |
| Sensor | — | Razer Focus Pro 30K |
| Weight | — | 101 g |
Design2▾
| Razer Habu | Razer BasiliskV3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Buttons | — | 11 |
| RGB lighting | — | ✓ |
Connect1▾
| Razer Habu | Razer BasiliskV3 | |
|---|---|---|
| 2.4GHz wireless | — | — |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Razer Habu or Razer BasiliskV3?
Razer BasiliskV3 edges ahead 45 to 44.
What are the main differences?
Scores are computed from 6 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 6 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.