Redmi A27U Type-C vs Redmi G Pro 27U
The short answer
Redmi A27U Type-C wins this comparison with a score of 62/100, ahead of Redmi G Pro 27U (61).
The main differences: Max refresh rate (60 Hz vs 160 Hz) · Panel type (IPS vs Fast-IPS) · Weight (with stand) (5500 g vs 4700 g).
Scores are computed from 5 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| Redmi A27U Type-C | Redmi G Pro 27U | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 42 | 42 |
| Ergonomics | 89 | 86 |
How to choose
Pick the Redmi G Pro 27U if you care about…
- Max refresh rate 160 Hz +100 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Weight (with stand) 4700 g +800 g vs 5500 g
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
GIGABYTE M27Q
MSI Optix MAG274QRF
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
LG UltraFine 27UL500
BENQ EW3270U
Where they differ
3 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Redmi A27U Type-C | Redmi G Pro 27U | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max refresh rate | 60 Hz | 160 Hz | Redmi G Pro 27U |
| Panel type | IPS | Fast-IPS | Depends |
| Weight (with stand) | 5500 g | 4700 g | Redmi G Pro 27U |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display4▾
| Redmi A27U Type-C | Redmi G Pro 27U | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 27 in | 27 in |
| Resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Max refresh rate | 60 Hz | 160 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | Fast-IPS |
Ergonomics1▾
| Redmi A27U Type-C | Redmi G Pro 27U | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (with stand) | 5500 g | 4700 g |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Redmi A27U Type-C or Redmi G Pro 27U?
Redmi A27U Type-C edges ahead 62 to 61. Choose Redmi G Pro 27U instead if Max refresh rate matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Max refresh rate (60 Hz vs 160 Hz) · Panel type (IPS vs Fast-IPS) · Weight (with stand) (5500 g vs 4700 g).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 5 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.