三星S24B300BL 三星S24B300BL vs 三星S34E790C 三星S34E790C
三星S34E790C 三星S34E790C — Pick the 三星S34E790C 三星S34E790C — it leads these groups: Display 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
三星S34E790C 三星S34E790C wins this comparison with a score of 61.4/100, ahead of 三星S24B300BL 三星S24B300BL (60.6).
The main differences: Screen size (23.6 in vs 34 in) · Resolution (1920x1080 vs 3440x1440) · Panel type (TN vs MVA).
Scores are computed from 4 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| 三星S24B300BL 三星S24B300BL | 三星S34E790C 三星S34E790C | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 40 | 46 |
| Ergonomics | 85 | 80 |
How to choose
Pick the 三星S24B300BL 三星S24B300BL if you care about…
- Weight (with stand) 5100 g +4800 g vs 9900 g
Pick the 三星S34E790C 三星S34E790C if you care about…
- Screen size 34 in +10.4 in vs 23.6 in
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Where they differ
4 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| 三星S24B300BL 三星S24B300BL | 三星S34E790C 三星S34E790C | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 23.6 in | 34 in | 三星S34E790C 三星S34E790C |
| Resolution | 1920x1080 | 3440x1440 | Depends |
| Panel type | TN | MVA | Depends |
| Weight (with stand) | 5100 g | 9900 g | 三星S24B300BL 三星S24B300BL |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display3▾
| 三星S24B300BL 三星S24B300BL | 三星S34E790C 三星S34E790C | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 23.6 in | 34 in |
| Resolution | 1920x1080 | 3440x1440 |
| Panel type | TN | MVA |
Ergonomics1▾
| 三星S24B300BL 三星S24B300BL | 三星S34E790C 三星S34E790C | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (with stand) | 5100 g | 9900 g |
Data sources: ZOL
FAQ
Which is better, 三星S24B300BL 三星S24B300BL or 三星S34E790C 三星S34E790C?
三星S34E790C 三星S34E790C edges ahead 61 to 61 and leads in Display. Choose 三星S24B300BL 三星S24B300BL instead if Weight (with stand) matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (23.6 in vs 34 in) · Resolution (1920x1080 vs 3440x1440) · Panel type (TN vs MVA).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 4 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.
GIGABYTE M27Q
MSI Optix MAG274QRF
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
LG UltraFine 27UL500
BENQ EW3270U