Samsung Galaxy A08 vs Samsung Galaxy A17
Samsung Galaxy A17 — Pick the Samsung Galaxy A17 — it leads these groups: Design 3 Display 1 Performance 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Samsung Galaxy A17 wins this comparison with a score of 35/100, ahead of Samsung Galaxy A08 (33).
The main differences: Pixel density (262 ppi vs 385 ppi) · Display type (PLS LCD vs Super AMOLED) · Battery capacity (6000 mAh vs 5000 mAh).
Scores are computed from 24 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Samsung Galaxy A08 if you care about…
- Battery capacity 6000 mAh +1000 mAh vs 5000 mAh
- Width 77.4 mm +0.5 mm vs 77.9 mm
Pick the Samsung Galaxy A17 if you care about…
- Pixel density 385 ppi +123 ppi vs 262 ppi
- Storage 128 GB +64 GB vs 64 GB
- Selfie camera 13 MP +5 MP vs 8 MP
- Weight 192 g +5 g vs 197 g
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
vivo X Fold6
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 10a
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Where they differ
12 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Samsung Galaxy A08 | Samsung Galaxy A17 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pixel density | 262 ppi | 385 ppi | Samsung Galaxy A17 |
| Display type | PLS LCD | Super AMOLED | Depends |
| Battery capacity | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A08 |
| Chipset | Helio G99 | Exynos 1330 | Depends |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 15 | Depends |
| Storage | 64 GB | 128 GB | Samsung Galaxy A17 |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP | Samsung Galaxy A17 |
| Weight | 197 g | 192 g | Samsung Galaxy A17 |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.5 mm | Samsung Galaxy A17 |
| Length | 167.4 mm | 164.4 mm | Samsung Galaxy A17 |
| Width | 77.4 mm | 77.9 mm | Samsung Galaxy A08 |
| Colors | Navy Blue, Silver, Green | Black, Gray, Blue | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| Samsung Galaxy A08 | Samsung Galaxy A17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 in | 6.7 in |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Pixel density | 262 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Display type | PLS LCD | Super AMOLED |
Battery3▾
| Samsung Galaxy A08 | Samsung Galaxy A17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | — | — |
Performance4▾
| Samsung Galaxy A08 | Samsung Galaxy A17 | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Chipset | Helio G99 | Exynos 1330 |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 15 |
| Storage | 64 GB | 128 GB |
Camera2▾
| Samsung Galaxy A08 | Samsung Galaxy A17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
Design6▾
| Samsung Galaxy A08 | Samsung Galaxy A17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 197 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | — | — |
| Length | 167.4 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 77.4 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Colors | Navy Blue, Silver, Green | Black, Gray, Blue |
Memory1▾
| Samsung Galaxy A08 | Samsung Galaxy A17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | ✓ | ✓ |
Platform1▾
| Samsung Galaxy A08 | Samsung Galaxy A17 | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
Features2▾
| Samsung Galaxy A08 | Samsung Galaxy A17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | — | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | ✓ | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Samsung Galaxy A08 or Samsung Galaxy A17?
Samsung Galaxy A17 edges ahead 35 to 33 and leads in Design, Display, Performance. Choose Samsung Galaxy A08 instead if Battery capacity matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Pixel density (262 ppi vs 385 ppi) · Display type (PLS LCD vs Super AMOLED) · Battery capacity (6000 mAh vs 5000 mAh).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 24 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.