EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6

🏆 Settled

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 — Pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 — it leads these groups: Design 3 Display 1

Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public

The short answer

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 wins this comparison with a score of 32/100, ahead of Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (31).

The main differences: Pixel density (373 ppi vs 374 ppi) · Display type (Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X vs Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X) · Chipset (Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 3).

Scores are computed from 26 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

Samsung
31score / 100
1 win · 20 tied
🏆 Overall winner Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6

Samsung
32score / 100
4 wins · 17 tied

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Display 28 32
Battery 28 28
Performance 55 55
Camera 14 14
Design 61 65
Platform 9 9
Features 50 50

How to choose

Pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 if you care about…

  • Width 129.9 mm +2.7 mm vs 132.6 mm

Pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 if you care about…

  • Pixel density 374 ppi +1 ppi vs 373 ppi
  • Weight 239 g +14 g vs 253 g
  • Thickness 5.6 mm +0.5 mm vs 6.1 mm
  • Length 153.5 mm +1.4 mm vs 154.9 mm

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

9 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Where they differ
Pixel density 373 ppi374 ppi Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Display type Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2XFoldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X Depends
Chipset Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Depends
OS Android 13Android 14 Depends
Weight 253 g239 g Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Thickness 6.1 mm5.6 mm Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Length 154.9 mm153.5 mm Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Width 129.9 mm132.6 mm Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Colors Icy Blue, Phantom Black, Cream, Gray, BlueNavy, Silver Shadow, Pink, Black, White Depends

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Display5▾
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Screen size 7.6 in 7.6 in
Peak brightness — 2600 nits
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Pixel density 373 ppi 374 ppi
Display type Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
Battery4▾
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Battery capacity 4400 mAh 4400 mAh
Wired charging 25 W 25 W
Wireless charging power 15 W 15 W
Wireless charging ✓ ✓
Performance4▾
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
RAM 12 GB 12 GB
Chipset Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
OS Android 13 Android 14
Storage 256 GB 256 GB
Camera2▾
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Selfie camera 4 MP 4 MP
Design7▾
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Weight 253 g 239 g
Thickness 6.1 mm 5.6 mm
Water resistant (IP68) — ✓
Length 154.9 mm 153.5 mm
Width 129.9 mm 132.6 mm
Colors Icy Blue, Phantom Black, Cream, Gray, Blue Navy, Silver Shadow, Pink, Black, White
Body material — 金属中框,玻璃后壳
Memory1▾
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Memory card slot — —
Platform1▾
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
CPU cores 8 8
Features2▾
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Face unlock — —
Fingerprint sensor ✓ ✓

Data sources: GSMArena

FAQ

Which is better, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6?

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 edges ahead 32 to 31 and leads in Design, Display. Choose Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 instead if Width matters more to you.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Pixel density (373 ppi vs 374 ppi) · Display type (Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X vs Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X) · Chipset (Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 3).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 26 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.