Samsung S27DG610SC vs Samsung S27FG812SC
The short answer
Samsung S27DG610SC wins this comparison with a score of 59.1/100, ahead of Samsung S27FG812SC (58.9).
The main differences: Resolution (2560x1440 vs 3840x2160).
Scores are computed from 5 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| Samsung S27DG610SC | Samsung S27FG812SC | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 44 | 44 |
| Ergonomics | 89 | 88 |
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Where they differ
1 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Samsung S27DG610SC | Samsung S27FG812SC | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 2560x1440 | 3840x2160 | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display4▾
| Samsung S27DG610SC | Samsung S27FG812SC | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 27 in | 27 in |
| Resolution | 2560x1440 | 3840x2160 |
| Max refresh rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | OLED |
Ergonomics1▾
| Samsung S27DG610SC | Samsung S27FG812SC | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (with stand) | 3800 g | — |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Samsung S27DG610SC or Samsung S27FG812SC?
Samsung S27DG610SC edges ahead 59 to 59.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Resolution (2560x1440 vs 3840x2160).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 5 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.
GIGABYTE M27Q
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
BENQ EW3270U
SAMSUNG Odyssey G7 32
SAMSUNG Odyssey G5 27