EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

Samsung S27FG902XC vs Samsung S32AM700PC

🏆 Settled

Samsung S32AM700PC — Pick the Samsung S32AM700PC — it leads these groups: Display 1

Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public

The short answer

Samsung S32AM700PC wins this comparison with a score of 59/100, ahead of Samsung S27FG902XC (58).

The main differences: Screen size (27 in vs 32 in) · Weight (with stand) (4700 g vs 6500 g).

Scores are computed from 5 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

Samsung S27FG902XC

Samsung S27FG902XC

Samsung
58score / 100
1 win · 2 tied ZOL Users ★ 0.0
🏆 Overall winner Samsung S32AM700PC

Samsung S32AM700PC

Samsung
59score / 100
1 win · 2 tied ZOL Users ★ 4.2 (1003)

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

Samsung S27FG902XCSamsung S32AM700PC
Display 39 44
Ergonomics 88 86

How to choose

Pick the Samsung S27FG902XC if you care about…

  • Weight (with stand) 4700 g +1800 g vs 6500 g

Pick the Samsung S32AM700PC if you care about…

  • Screen size 32 in +5 in vs 27 in

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

2 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

Samsung S27FG902XCSamsung S32AM700PCWhere they differ
Screen size 27 in32 in Samsung S32AM700PC
Weight (with stand) 4700 g6500 g Samsung S27FG902XC

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Display4▾
Samsung S27FG902XCSamsung S32AM700PC
Screen size 27 in 32 in
Resolution 3840x2160 3840x2160
Max refresh rate 165 Hz —
Panel type IPS —
Ergonomics1▾
Samsung S27FG902XCSamsung S32AM700PC
Weight (with stand) 4700 g 6500 g

Data sources: GSMArena

FAQ

Which is better, Samsung S27FG902XC or Samsung S32AM700PC?

Samsung S32AM700PC edges ahead 59 to 58 and leads in Display. Choose Samsung S27FG902XC instead if Weight (with stand) matters more to you.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Screen size (27 in vs 32 in) · Weight (with stand) (4700 g vs 6500 g).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 5 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.