Samsung S32DG802SC vs Samsung S32E360F
Samsung S32DG802SC — Pick the Samsung S32DG802SC — it leads these groups: Display 2 Ergonomics 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Samsung S32DG802SC wins this comparison with a score of 60/100, ahead of Samsung S32E360F (56).
The main differences: Screen size (32 in vs 31.5 in) · Resolution (3840x2160 vs 1920x1080) · Max refresh rate (240 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Scores are computed from 5 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| Samsung S32DG802SC | Samsung S32E360F | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 47 | 37 |
| Ergonomics | 87 | 85 |
How to choose
Pick the Samsung S32DG802SC if you care about…
- Screen size 32 in +0.5 in vs 31.5 in
- Max refresh rate 240 Hz +180 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Weight (with stand) 5300 g +1750 g vs 7050 g
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
GIGABYTE M27Q
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
BENQ EW3270U
SAMSUNG Odyssey G7 32
SAMSUNG Odyssey G5 27
Where they differ
5 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Samsung S32DG802SC | Samsung S32E360F | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 32 in | 31.5 in | Samsung S32DG802SC |
| Resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 | Depends |
| Max refresh rate | 240 Hz | 60 Hz | Samsung S32DG802SC |
| Panel type | OLED | MVA | Depends |
| Weight (with stand) | 5300 g | 7050 g | Samsung S32DG802SC |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display4▾
| Samsung S32DG802SC | Samsung S32E360F | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 32 in | 31.5 in |
| Resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Max refresh rate | 240 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | MVA |
Ergonomics1▾
| Samsung S32DG802SC | Samsung S32E360F | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (with stand) | 5300 g | 7050 g |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Samsung S32DG802SC or Samsung S32E360F?
Samsung S32DG802SC has the higher overall score (60 vs 56) and leads in Display, Ergonomics.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (32 in vs 31.5 in) · Resolution (3840x2160 vs 1920x1080) · Max refresh rate (240 Hz vs 60 Hz).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 5 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.