Samsung U28E850R vs Samsung U28R550UQC
Samsung U28R550UQC — Pick the Samsung U28R550UQC — it leads these groups: Ergonomics 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Samsung U28R550UQC wins this comparison with a score of 60/100, ahead of Samsung U28E850R (59).
The main differences: Panel type (TN vs IPS) · Weight (with stand) (10000 g vs 5600 g).
Scores are computed from 5 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| Samsung U28E850R | Samsung U28R550UQC | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 39 | 39 |
| Ergonomics | 80 | 85 |
How to choose
Pick the Samsung U28R550UQC if you care about…
- Weight (with stand) 5600 g +4400 g vs 10000 g
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
GIGABYTE M27Q
MSI Optix MAG274QRF
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
LG UltraFine 27UL500
BENQ EW3270U
Where they differ
2 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Samsung U28E850R | Samsung U28R550UQC | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Panel type | TN | IPS | Depends |
| Weight (with stand) | 10000 g | 5600 g | Samsung U28R550UQC |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display4▾
| Samsung U28E850R | Samsung U28R550UQC | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 28 in | 28 in |
| Resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Max refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Panel type | TN | IPS |
Ergonomics1▾
| Samsung U28E850R | Samsung U28R550UQC | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (with stand) | 10000 g | 5600 g |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Samsung U28E850R or Samsung U28R550UQC?
Samsung U28R550UQC edges ahead 60 to 59 and leads in Ergonomics.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Panel type (TN vs IPS) · Weight (with stand) (10000 g vs 5600 g).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 5 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.