SANC G52Max vs SANC N50Pro
The short answer
SANC G52Max wins this comparison with a score of 60.8/100, ahead of SANC N50Pro (60.8).
The main differences: Screen size (23.8 in vs 24 in) · Max refresh rate (180 Hz vs 144 Hz) · Panel type (Fast-IPS vs IPS).
Scores are computed from 5 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| SANC G52Max | SANC N50Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 40 | 39 |
| Ergonomics | 85 | 87 |
How to choose
Pick the SANC G52Max if you care about…
- Max refresh rate 180 Hz +36 Hz vs 144 Hz
Pick the SANC N50Pro if you care about…
- Screen size 24 in +0.2 in vs 23.8 in
- Weight (with stand) 3900 g +1300 g vs 5200 g
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
GIGABYTE M27Q
MSI Optix MAG274QRF
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
LG UltraFine 27UL500
BENQ EW3270U
Where they differ
4 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| SANC G52Max | SANC N50Pro | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 23.8 in | 24 in | SANC N50Pro |
| Max refresh rate | 180 Hz | 144 Hz | SANC G52Max |
| Panel type | Fast-IPS | IPS | Depends |
| Weight (with stand) | 5200 g | 3900 g | SANC N50Pro |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display4▾
| SANC G52Max | SANC N50Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 23.8 in | 24 in |
| Resolution | — | 1920x1080 |
| Max refresh rate | 180 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | Fast-IPS | IPS |
Ergonomics1▾
| SANC G52Max | SANC N50Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (with stand) | 5200 g | 3900 g |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, SANC G52Max or SANC N50Pro?
SANC G52Max edges ahead 61 to 61. Choose SANC N50Pro instead if Screen size matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (23.8 in vs 24 in) · Max refresh rate (180 Hz vs 144 Hz) · Panel type (Fast-IPS vs IPS).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 5 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.