Sculptor MF16LQ vs Skyworth 28U1
The short answer
Skyworth 28U1 wins this comparison with a score of 58/100, ahead of Sculptor MF16LQ (56).
The main differences: Resolution (2560x1600 vs 3840x2160).
Scores are computed from 3 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| Sculptor MF16LQ | Skyworth 28U1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 34 | 40 |
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
GIGABYTE M27Q
DELL UltraSharp U2723QE
DELL S2721QS
BENQ EW3270U
SAMSUNG Odyssey G7 32
SAMSUNG Odyssey G5 27
Where they differ
1 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Sculptor MF16LQ | Skyworth 28U1 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 2560x1600 | 3840x2160 | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display3▾
| Sculptor MF16LQ | Skyworth 28U1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 2560x1600 | 3840x2160 |
| Max refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Sculptor MF16LQ or Skyworth 28U1?
Skyworth 28U1 edges ahead 58 to 56.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Resolution (2560x1600 vs 3840x2160).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 3 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.