EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

Sharp Aquos sense7 plus vs Sharp Aquos sense8

🏆 Settled

Sharp Aquos sense7 plus — Pick the Sharp Aquos sense7 plus — it leads these groups: Display 2 Battery 1 Camera 1

Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public

The short answer

Sharp Aquos sense7 plus wins this comparison with a score of 41/100, ahead of Sharp Aquos sense8 (40).

The main differences: Screen size (6.4 in vs 6.1 in) · Refresh rate (120 Hz vs 90 Hz) · Pixel density (403 ppi vs 422 ppi).

Scores are computed from 24 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

🏆 Overall winner Sharp Aquos sense7 plus

Sharp Aquos sense7 plus

Sharp
41score / 100
5 wins · 15 tied
Sharp Aquos sense8

Sharp Aquos sense8

Sharp
40score / 100
6 wins · 14 tied

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

Sharp Aquos sense7 plusSharp Aquos sense8
Display 21 15
Battery 33 14
Performance 32 45
Camera 17 17
Design 80 85
Memory 100 100
Platform 9 9
Features 50 50

How to choose

Pick the Sharp Aquos sense7 plus if you care about…

  • Screen size 6.4 in +0.3 in vs 6.1 in
  • Refresh rate 120 Hz +30 Hz vs 90 Hz
  • Battery capacity 5050 mAh +50 mAh vs 5000 mAh
  • Main camera 50.3 MP +0.3 MP vs 50 MP

Pick the Sharp Aquos sense8 if you care about…

  • Pixel density 422 ppi +19 ppi vs 403 ppi
  • RAM 8 GB +2 GB vs 6 GB
  • Storage 256 GB +128 GB vs 128 GB
  • Weight 159 g +13 g vs 172 g

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

14 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

Sharp Aquos sense7 plusSharp Aquos sense8Where they differ
Screen size 6.4 in6.1 in Sharp Aquos sense7 plus
Refresh rate 120 Hz90 Hz Sharp Aquos sense7 plus
Pixel density 403 ppi422 ppi Sharp Aquos sense8
Battery capacity 5050 mAh5000 mAh Sharp Aquos sense7 plus
RAM 6 GB8 GB Sharp Aquos sense8
Chipset Snapdragon 695 5GSnapdragon 6 Gen 1 Depends
OS Android 12Android 13 Depends
Storage 128 GB256 GB Sharp Aquos sense8
Main camera 50.3 MP50 MP Sharp Aquos sense7 plus
Weight 172 g159 g Sharp Aquos sense8
Thickness 8.2 mm8.4 mm Sharp Aquos sense7 plus
Length 160 mm153 mm Sharp Aquos sense8
Width 76 mm71 mm Sharp Aquos sense8
Colors Moon silverBlack, Green, Copper Depends

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Display5▾
Sharp Aquos sense7 plusSharp Aquos sense8
Screen size 6.4 in 6.1 in
Peak brightness 1300 nits 1300 nits
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Pixel density 403 ppi 422 ppi
Display type IGZO OLED IGZO OLED
Battery3▾
Sharp Aquos sense7 plusSharp Aquos sense8
Battery capacity 5050 mAh 5000 mAh
Wired charging — 18 W
Wireless charging — —
Performance4▾
Sharp Aquos sense7 plusSharp Aquos sense8
RAM 6 GB 8 GB
Chipset Snapdragon 695 5G Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
OS Android 12 Android 13
Storage 128 GB 256 GB
Camera2▾
Sharp Aquos sense7 plusSharp Aquos sense8
Main camera 50.3 MP 50 MP
Selfie camera 8 MP 8 MP
Design6▾
Sharp Aquos sense7 plusSharp Aquos sense8
Weight 172 g 159 g
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.4 mm
Water resistant (IP68) ✓ —
Length 160 mm 153 mm
Width 76 mm 71 mm
Colors Moon silver Black, Green, Copper
Memory1▾
Sharp Aquos sense7 plusSharp Aquos sense8
Memory card slot ✓ ✓
Platform1▾
Sharp Aquos sense7 plusSharp Aquos sense8
CPU cores 8 8
Features2▾
Sharp Aquos sense7 plusSharp Aquos sense8
Face unlock — —
Fingerprint sensor ✓ ✓

Data sources: GSMArena

FAQ

Which is better, Sharp Aquos sense7 plus or Sharp Aquos sense8?

Sharp Aquos sense7 plus edges ahead 41 to 40 and leads in Display, Battery, Camera. Choose Sharp Aquos sense8 instead if Pixel density matters more to you.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Screen size (6.4 in vs 6.1 in) · Refresh rate (120 Hz vs 90 Hz) · Pixel density (403 ppi vs 422 ppi).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 24 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.