Tecno Camon 40 Pro vs Tecno Camon 50
Tecno Camon 40 Pro — Pick the Tecno Camon 40 Pro — it leads these groups: Design 2 Performance 1 Camera 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Tecno Camon 40 Pro wins this comparison with a score of 45/100, ahead of Tecno Camon 50 (44).
The main differences: Refresh rate (120 Hz vs 144 Hz) · Pixel density (393 ppi vs 429 ppi) · Battery capacity (5200 mAh vs 6150 mAh).
Scores are computed from 23 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Tecno Camon 40 Pro if you care about…
- Storage 256 GB +128 GB vs 128 GB
- Selfie camera 50 MP +18 MP vs 32 MP
- Thickness 7.3 mm +0.2 mm vs 7.5 mm
- Width 74.3 mm +2.9 mm vs 77.2 mm
Pick the Tecno Camon 50 if you care about…
- Refresh rate 144 Hz +24 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Pixel density 429 ppi +36 ppi vs 393 ppi
- Battery capacity 6150 mAh +950 mAh vs 5200 mAh
- Length 162.4 mm +2 mm vs 164.4 mm
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
vivo X Fold6
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 10a
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Where they differ
11 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Tecno Camon 40 Pro | Tecno Camon 50 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | Tecno Camon 50 |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 429 ppi | Tecno Camon 50 |
| Battery capacity | 5200 mAh | 6150 mAh | Tecno Camon 50 |
| Chipset | Helio G100 Ultimate | Helio G200 Ultimate | Depends |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | Depends |
| Storage | 256 GB | 128 GB | Tecno Camon 40 Pro |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | Tecno Camon 40 Pro |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7.5 mm | Tecno Camon 40 Pro |
| Length | 164.4 mm | 162.4 mm | Tecno Camon 50 |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 77.2 mm | Tecno Camon 40 Pro |
| Colors | Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black, Glacier White | Moonlight black, Malachite green, Nebula titanium, Fir green, Lavender mist, Mint cream | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display4▾
| Tecno Camon 40 Pro | Tecno Camon 50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.8 in | 6.8 in |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Display type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
Battery3▾
| Tecno Camon 40 Pro | Tecno Camon 50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 5200 mAh | 6150 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | — |
Performance4▾
| Tecno Camon 40 Pro | Tecno Camon 50 | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Chipset | Helio G100 Ultimate | Helio G200 Ultimate |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Storage | 256 GB | 128 GB |
Camera2▾
| Tecno Camon 40 Pro | Tecno Camon 50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
Design6▾
| Tecno Camon 40 Pro | Tecno Camon 50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 178 g | — |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Length | 164.4 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 77.2 mm |
| Colors | Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black, Glacier White | Moonlight black, Malachite green, Nebula titanium, Fir green, Lavender mist, Mint cream |
Memory1▾
| Tecno Camon 40 Pro | Tecno Camon 50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | ✓ | ✓ |
Platform1▾
| Tecno Camon 40 Pro | Tecno Camon 50 | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
Features2▾
| Tecno Camon 40 Pro | Tecno Camon 50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | — | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | ✓ | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Tecno Camon 40 Pro or Tecno Camon 50?
Tecno Camon 40 Pro edges ahead 45 to 44 and leads in Design, Performance, Camera. Choose Tecno Camon 50 instead if Refresh rate matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Refresh rate (120 Hz vs 144 Hz) · Pixel density (393 ppi vs 429 ppi) · Battery capacity (5200 mAh vs 6150 mAh).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 23 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.