Tecno Camon 50 Pro vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
Tecno Camon 50 Pro — Pick the Tecno Camon 50 Pro — it leads these groups: Design 1 Memory 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Tecno Camon 50 Pro wins this comparison with a score of 45/100, ahead of Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (37).
The main differences: Battery capacity (6150 mAh vs 6160 mAh) · Wired charging (60 W vs 45 W) · Chipset (Helio G200 Ultimate vs Dimensity 7400 Ultimate).
Scores are computed from 23 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Tecno Camon 50 Pro if you care about…
- Wired charging 60 W +15 W vs 45 W
- Thickness 7.4 mm +0.4 mm vs 7.8 mm
- Memory card slot ✓ vs —
Pick the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra if you care about…
- Battery capacity 6160 mAh +10 mAh vs 6150 mAh
- Selfie camera 50 MP +18 MP vs 32 MP
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
vivo X Fold6
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 10a
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Where they differ
7 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Tecno Camon 50 Pro | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 6150 mAh | 6160 mAh | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra |
| Wired charging | 60 W | 45 W | Tecno Camon 50 Pro |
| Chipset | Helio G200 Ultimate | Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | Depends |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 7.8 mm | Tecno Camon 50 Pro |
| Colors | Moonlight black, Malachite green, Nebula titanium, Fir green, Lavender mist, Ethereal blue | Moonshadow Black, Cypress Green, Nebula Titanium, Luminous Orange, Misty Purple | Depends |
| Memory card slot | ✓ | — | Tecno Camon 50 Pro |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display4▾
| Tecno Camon 50 Pro | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.8 in | 6.8 in |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Pixel density | 429 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Display type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
Battery3▾
| Tecno Camon 50 Pro | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 6150 mAh | 6160 mAh |
| Wired charging | 60 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | — |
Performance4▾
| Tecno Camon 50 Pro | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Chipset | Helio G200 Ultimate | Dimensity 7400 Ultimate |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
Camera2▾
| Tecno Camon 50 Pro | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
Design6▾
| Tecno Camon 50 Pro | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | — | 178 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Length | 162.4 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 77 mm |
| Colors | Moonlight black, Malachite green, Nebula titanium, Fir green, Lavender mist, Ethereal blue | Moonshadow Black, Cypress Green, Nebula Titanium, Luminous Orange, Misty Purple |
Memory1▾
| Tecno Camon 50 Pro | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | ✓ | — |
Platform1▾
| Tecno Camon 50 Pro | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
Features2▾
| Tecno Camon 50 Pro | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | — | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | ✓ | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Tecno Camon 50 Pro or Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
Tecno Camon 50 Pro has the higher overall score (45 vs 37) and leads in Design, Memory. Choose Tecno Camon 50 Ultra instead if Battery capacity matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Battery capacity (6150 mAh vs 6160 mAh) · Wired charging (60 W vs 45 W) · Chipset (Helio G200 Ultimate vs Dimensity 7400 Ultimate).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 23 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.