Tecno Phantom V Flip2 vs Tecno Phantom V Fold2
Tecno Phantom V Fold2 — Pick the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 — it leads these groups: Battery 2 Performance 2
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Tecno Phantom V Fold2 wins this comparison with a score of 37/100, ahead of Tecno Phantom V Flip2 (33).
The main differences: Screen size (6.9 in vs 7.8 in) · Pixel density (413 ppi vs 388 ppi) · Battery capacity (4720 mAh vs 5750 mAh).
Scores are computed from 25 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Tecno Phantom V Flip2 if you care about…
- Pixel density 413 ppi +25 ppi vs 388 ppi
- Weight 196 g +53 g vs 249 g
- Width 73.4 mm +67 mm vs 140.4 mm
Pick the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 if you care about…
- Screen size 7.8 in +0.9 in vs 6.9 in
- Battery capacity 5750 mAh +1030 mAh vs 4720 mAh
- Wireless charging ✓ vs —
- RAM 12 GB +4 GB vs 8 GB
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
vivo X Fold6
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 10a
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Where they differ
12 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Tecno Phantom V Flip2 | Tecno Phantom V Fold2 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 in | 7.8 in | Tecno Phantom V Fold2 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 388 ppi | Tecno Phantom V Flip2 |
| Battery capacity | 4720 mAh | 5750 mAh | Tecno Phantom V Fold2 |
| Wireless charging | — | ✓ | Tecno Phantom V Fold2 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB | Tecno Phantom V Fold2 |
| Chipset | Dimensity 8020 | Dimensity 9000+ | Depends |
| Storage | 256 GB | 512 GB | Tecno Phantom V Fold2 |
| Weight | 196 g | 249 g | Tecno Phantom V Flip2 |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 6.1 mm | Tecno Phantom V Fold2 |
| Length | 170.8 mm | 159 mm | Tecno Phantom V Fold2 |
| Width | 73.4 mm | 140.4 mm | Tecno Phantom V Flip2 |
| Colors | Travertine Green, Moondust Grey | Karst Green, Rippling Blue | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| Tecno Phantom V Flip2 | Tecno Phantom V Fold2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 in | 7.8 in |
| Peak brightness | — | 1600 nits |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Display type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
Battery4▾
| Tecno Phantom V Flip2 | Tecno Phantom V Fold2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 4720 mAh | 5750 mAh |
| Wired charging | 70 W | 70 W |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Wireless charging | — | ✓ |
Performance4▾
| Tecno Phantom V Flip2 | Tecno Phantom V Fold2 | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Chipset | Dimensity 8020 | Dimensity 9000+ |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Storage | 256 GB | 512 GB |
Camera2▾
| Tecno Phantom V Flip2 | Tecno Phantom V Fold2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
Design6▾
| Tecno Phantom V Flip2 | Tecno Phantom V Fold2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 196 g | 249 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 6.1 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | — | — |
| Length | 170.8 mm | 159 mm |
| Width | 73.4 mm | 140.4 mm |
| Colors | Travertine Green, Moondust Grey | Karst Green, Rippling Blue |
Memory1▾
| Tecno Phantom V Flip2 | Tecno Phantom V Fold2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | — | — |
Platform1▾
| Tecno Phantom V Flip2 | Tecno Phantom V Fold2 | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
Features2▾
| Tecno Phantom V Flip2 | Tecno Phantom V Fold2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | — | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | ✓ | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Tecno Phantom V Flip2 or Tecno Phantom V Fold2?
Tecno Phantom V Fold2 has the higher overall score (37 vs 33) and leads in Battery, Performance. Choose Tecno Phantom V Flip2 instead if Pixel density matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (6.9 in vs 7.8 in) · Pixel density (413 ppi vs 388 ppi) · Battery capacity (4720 mAh vs 5750 mAh).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 25 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.