Tecno Pova 7 Ultra vs Tecno Pova 8
Tecno Pova 8 — Pick the Tecno Pova 8 — it leads these groups: Memory 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Tecno Pova 8 wins this comparison with a score of 38/100, ahead of Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (36).
The main differences: Screen size (6.7 in vs 6.8 in) · Pixel density (460 ppi vs 381 ppi) · Display type (AMOLED vs IPS LCD).
Scores are computed from 25 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra if you care about…
- Pixel density 460 ppi +79 ppi vs 381 ppi
- Wired charging 70 W +25 W vs 45 W
- Wireless charging ✓ vs —
- RAM 8 GB +2 GB vs 6 GB
Pick the Tecno Pova 8 if you care about…
- Screen size 6.8 in +0.1 in vs 6.7 in
- Battery capacity 8000 mAh +2000 mAh vs 6000 mAh
- Thickness 8.8 mm +0.1 mm vs 8.9 mm
- Memory card slot ✓ vs —
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Where they differ
16 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Tecno Pova 7 Ultra | Tecno Pova 8 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 in | 6.8 in | Tecno Pova 8 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 381 ppi | Tecno Pova 7 Ultra |
| Display type | AMOLED | IPS LCD | Depends |
| Battery capacity | 6000 mAh | 8000 mAh | Tecno Pova 8 |
| Wired charging | 70 W | 45 W | Tecno Pova 7 Ultra |
| Wireless charging | ✓ | — | Tecno Pova 7 Ultra |
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB | Tecno Pova 7 Ultra |
| Chipset | Dimensity 8350 Ultimate | Dimensity 7100 | Depends |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | Depends |
| Storage | 256 GB | 128 GB | Tecno Pova 7 Ultra |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | Tecno Pova 7 Ultra |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.8 mm | Tecno Pova 8 |
| Length | 160 mm | 165.7 mm | Tecno Pova 7 Ultra |
| Width | 75.2 mm | 78.5 mm | Tecno Pova 7 Ultra |
| Colors | Geek White, Geek Black | Arc White, Graphite Black, Helios Orange, Echo Green, Bit White (India), Terminal Green (India) | Depends |
| Memory card slot | — | ✓ | Tecno Pova 8 |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| Tecno Pova 7 Ultra | Tecno Pova 8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 in | 6.8 in |
| Peak brightness | 4500 nits | — |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 381 ppi |
| Display type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
Battery4▾
| Tecno Pova 7 Ultra | Tecno Pova 8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 6000 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 70 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | — |
| Wireless charging | ✓ | — |
Performance4▾
| Tecno Pova 7 Ultra | Tecno Pova 8 | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Chipset | Dimensity 8350 Ultimate | Dimensity 7100 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Storage | 256 GB | 128 GB |
Camera2▾
| Tecno Pova 7 Ultra | Tecno Pova 8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
Design6▾
| Tecno Pova 7 Ultra | Tecno Pova 8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | — | 225 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | — | — |
| Length | 160 mm | 165.7 mm |
| Width | 75.2 mm | 78.5 mm |
| Colors | Geek White, Geek Black | Arc White, Graphite Black, Helios Orange, Echo Green, Bit White (India), Terminal Green (India) |
Memory1▾
| Tecno Pova 7 Ultra | Tecno Pova 8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | — | ✓ |
Platform1▾
| Tecno Pova 7 Ultra | Tecno Pova 8 | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
Features2▾
| Tecno Pova 7 Ultra | Tecno Pova 8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | — | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | ✓ | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Tecno Pova 7 Ultra or Tecno Pova 8?
Tecno Pova 8 edges ahead 38 to 36 and leads in Memory. Choose Tecno Pova 7 Ultra instead if Pixel density matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (6.7 in vs 6.8 in) · Pixel density (460 ppi vs 381 ppi) · Display type (AMOLED vs IPS LCD).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 25 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.
vivo X Fold6
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold