Tecno Pova 7 vs Tecno Pova 7 Pro
Tecno Pova 7 — Pick the Tecno Pova 7 — it leads these groups: Memory 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Tecno Pova 7 wins this comparison with a score of 34/100, ahead of Tecno Pova 7 Pro (33).
The main differences: Refresh rate (120 Hz vs 144 Hz) · Pixel density (396 ppi vs 440 ppi) · Battery capacity (7000 mAh vs 6000 mAh).
Scores are computed from 25 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Tecno Pova 7 if you care about…
- Battery capacity 7000 mAh +1000 mAh vs 6000 mAh
- Main camera 108 MP +44 MP vs 64 MP
- Memory card slot ✓ vs —
Pick the Tecno Pova 7 Pro if you care about…
- Refresh rate 144 Hz +24 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Pixel density 440 ppi +44 ppi vs 396 ppi
- Wireless charging ✓ vs —
- Selfie camera 13 MP +5 MP vs 8 MP
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
vivo X Fold6
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 10a
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Where they differ
14 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Tecno Pova 7 | Tecno Pova 7 Pro | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | Tecno Pova 7 Pro |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 440 ppi | Tecno Pova 7 Pro |
| Battery capacity | 7000 mAh | 6000 mAh | Tecno Pova 7 |
| Wireless charging | — | ✓ | Tecno Pova 7 Pro |
| Chipset | Helio G100 Ultimate | Dimensity 7300 Ultimate | Depends |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP | Tecno Pova 7 |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP | Tecno Pova 7 Pro |
| Weight | 207 g | 195 g | Tecno Pova 7 Pro |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm | 8.2 mm | Tecno Pova 7 Pro |
| Length | 168.6 mm | 163.5 mm | Tecno Pova 7 Pro |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 75.9 mm | Tecno Pova 7 Pro |
| Colors | Hyper Titanium, Magic Silver, Geek Black | Geek Black, Dynamic Grey, Neon Cyan | Depends |
| Memory card slot | ✓ | — | Tecno Pova 7 |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | ✓ | Tecno Pova 7 Pro |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| Tecno Pova 7 | Tecno Pova 7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.8 in | 6.8 in |
| Peak brightness | — | 4500 nits |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 440 ppi |
| Display type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
Battery4▾
| Tecno Pova 7 | Tecno Pova 7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 7000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | 30 W |
| Wireless charging | — | ✓ |
Performance4▾
| Tecno Pova 7 | Tecno Pova 7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Chipset | Helio G100 Ultimate | Dimensity 7300 Ultimate |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB |
Camera2▾
| Tecno Pova 7 | Tecno Pova 7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
Design6▾
| Tecno Pova 7 | Tecno Pova 7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 207 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | — | — |
| Length | 168.6 mm | 163.5 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Colors | Hyper Titanium, Magic Silver, Geek Black | Geek Black, Dynamic Grey, Neon Cyan |
Memory1▾
| Tecno Pova 7 | Tecno Pova 7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | ✓ | — |
Platform1▾
| Tecno Pova 7 | Tecno Pova 7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
Features2▾
| Tecno Pova 7 | Tecno Pova 7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | — | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Tecno Pova 7 or Tecno Pova 7 Pro?
Tecno Pova 7 edges ahead 34 to 33 and leads in Memory. Choose Tecno Pova 7 Pro instead if Refresh rate matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Refresh rate (120 Hz vs 144 Hz) · Pixel density (396 ppi vs 440 ppi) · Battery capacity (7000 mAh vs 6000 mAh).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 25 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.