Tecno Pova 8 Pro vs Tecno Pova Curve
Tecno Pova 8 Pro — Pick the Tecno Pova 8 Pro — it leads these groups: Design 3 Display 2 Performance 2
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Tecno Pova 8 Pro wins this comparison with a score of 44/100, ahead of Tecno Pova Curve (27).
The main differences: Peak brightness (4500 nits vs 1300 nits) · Pixel density (429 ppi vs 393 ppi) · Battery capacity (6500 mAh vs 5500 mAh).
Scores are computed from 24 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Tecno Pova 8 Pro if you care about…
- Peak brightness 4500 nits +3200 nits vs 1300 nits
- Pixel density 429 ppi +36 ppi vs 393 ppi
- Battery capacity 6500 mAh +1000 mAh vs 5500 mAh
- RAM 8 GB +2 GB vs 6 GB
Pick the Tecno Pova Curve if you care about…
- Main camera 64 MP +14 MP vs 50 MP
- Weight 188.5 g +0.5 g vs 189 g
- Width 74.6 mm +2.7 mm vs 77.3 mm
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
vivo X Fold6
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 10a
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Where they differ
15 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Tecno Pova 8 Pro | Tecno Pova Curve | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peak brightness | 4500 nits | 1300 nits | Tecno Pova 8 Pro |
| Pixel density | 429 ppi | 393 ppi | Tecno Pova 8 Pro |
| Battery capacity | 6500 mAh | 5500 mAh | Tecno Pova 8 Pro |
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB | Tecno Pova 8 Pro |
| Chipset | Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | Dimensity 7300 Ultimate | Depends |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | Depends |
| Storage | 256 GB | 128 GB | Tecno Pova 8 Pro |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | Tecno Pova Curve |
| Weight | 189 g | 188.5 g | Tecno Pova Curve |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 7.5 mm | Tecno Pova 8 Pro |
| Water resistant (IP68) | ✓ | — | Tecno Pova 8 Pro |
| Length | 162.5 mm | 164.3 mm | Tecno Pova 8 Pro |
| Width | 77.3 mm | 74.6 mm | Tecno Pova Curve |
| Colors | Arc White, Graphite Black, Tundra Green, Tonino Lamborghini Black | Neon Cyan, Magic Silver, Geek Black | Depends |
| Memory card slot | ✓ | — | Tecno Pova 8 Pro |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| Tecno Pova 8 Pro | Tecno Pova Curve | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.8 in | 6.8 in |
| Peak brightness | 4500 nits | 1300 nits |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Pixel density | 429 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Display type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
Battery3▾
| Tecno Pova 8 Pro | Tecno Pova Curve | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 6500 mAh | 5500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | — |
Performance4▾
| Tecno Pova 8 Pro | Tecno Pova Curve | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Chipset | Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | Dimensity 7300 Ultimate |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Storage | 256 GB | 128 GB |
Camera2▾
| Tecno Pova 8 Pro | Tecno Pova Curve | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
Design6▾
| Tecno Pova 8 Pro | Tecno Pova Curve | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g | 188.5 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | ✓ | — |
| Length | 162.5 mm | 164.3 mm |
| Width | 77.3 mm | 74.6 mm |
| Colors | Arc White, Graphite Black, Tundra Green, Tonino Lamborghini Black | Neon Cyan, Magic Silver, Geek Black |
Memory1▾
| Tecno Pova 8 Pro | Tecno Pova Curve | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | ✓ | — |
Platform1▾
| Tecno Pova 8 Pro | Tecno Pova Curve | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
Features2▾
| Tecno Pova 8 Pro | Tecno Pova Curve | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | — | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | ✓ | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Tecno Pova 8 Pro or Tecno Pova Curve?
Tecno Pova 8 Pro has the higher overall score (44 vs 27) and leads in Design, Display, Performance. Choose Tecno Pova Curve instead if Main camera matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Peak brightness (4500 nits vs 1300 nits) · Pixel density (429 ppi vs 393 ppi) · Battery capacity (6500 mAh vs 5500 mAh).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 24 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.