Tecno Spark 30 vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
Tecno Spark 30 Pro — Pick the Tecno Spark 30 Pro — it leads these groups: Display 2 Design 2 Battery 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Tecno Spark 30 Pro wins this comparison with a score of 40/100, ahead of Tecno Spark 30 (36).
The main differences: Peak brightness (800 nits vs 1700 nits) · Refresh rate (90 Hz vs 120 Hz) · Pixel density (396 ppi vs 393 ppi).
Scores are computed from 23 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Tecno Spark 30 if you care about…
- Pixel density 396 ppi +3 ppi vs 393 ppi
- Width 76.4 mm +0.6 mm vs 77 mm
Pick the Tecno Spark 30 Pro if you care about…
- Peak brightness 1700 nits +900 nits vs 800 nits
- Refresh rate 120 Hz +30 Hz vs 90 Hz
- Wired charging 33 W +15 W vs 18 W
- Main camera 108 MP +44 MP vs 64 MP
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
vivo X Fold6
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 10a
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Where they differ
11 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Tecno Spark 30 | Tecno Spark 30 Pro | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 1700 nits | Tecno Spark 30 Pro |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | Tecno Spark 30 Pro |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 393 ppi | Tecno Spark 30 |
| Display type | IPS LCD | AMOLED | Depends |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 33 W | Tecno Spark 30 Pro |
| Chipset | Helio G91 | Helio G100 | Depends |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 108 MP | Tecno Spark 30 Pro |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.4 mm | Tecno Spark 30 Pro |
| Length | 168 mm | 166.6 mm | Tecno Spark 30 Pro |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 77 mm | Tecno Spark 30 |
| Colors | Stellar Shadow, Astral Ice, Magic Skin 3.0, Bumblebee Edition | Obsidian Edge, Arctic Glow, Magic Skin 3.0, Optimus Prime Edition | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| Tecno Spark 30 | Tecno Spark 30 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.8 in | 6.8 in |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 1700 nits |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Display type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
Battery3▾
| Tecno Spark 30 | Tecno Spark 30 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | — | — |
Performance4▾
| Tecno Spark 30 | Tecno Spark 30 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Chipset | Helio G91 | Helio G100 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB |
Camera2▾
| Tecno Spark 30 | Tecno Spark 30 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 64 MP | 108 MP |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
Design5▾
| Tecno Spark 30 | Tecno Spark 30 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | — | — |
| Length | 168 mm | 166.6 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 77 mm |
| Colors | Stellar Shadow, Astral Ice, Magic Skin 3.0, Bumblebee Edition | Obsidian Edge, Arctic Glow, Magic Skin 3.0, Optimus Prime Edition |
Memory1▾
| Tecno Spark 30 | Tecno Spark 30 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | ✓ | ✓ |
Platform1▾
| Tecno Spark 30 | Tecno Spark 30 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
Features2▾
| Tecno Spark 30 | Tecno Spark 30 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | — | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | ✓ | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Tecno Spark 30 or Tecno Spark 30 Pro?
Tecno Spark 30 Pro has the higher overall score (40 vs 36) and leads in Display, Design, Battery. Choose Tecno Spark 30 instead if Pixel density matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Peak brightness (800 nits vs 1700 nits) · Refresh rate (90 Hz vs 120 Hz) · Pixel density (396 ppi vs 393 ppi).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 23 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.