EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

Tecno Spark Slim vs Vivo vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

🏆 Settled

Vivo vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — Pick the Vivo vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — it leads these groups: Display 3 Battery 3 Performance 1

Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public

The short answer

Vivo vivo iQOO 15 Ultra wins this comparison with a score of 46/100, ahead of Tecno Spark Slim (31).

The main differences: Peak brightness (4500 nits vs 8000 nits) · Pixel density (440 ppi vs 508 ppi) · Battery capacity (5160 mAh vs 7400 mAh).

Scores are computed from 25 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

Tecno Spark Slim

Tecno Spark Slim

Tecno
31score / 100
3 wins · 18 tied
🏆 Overall winner Vivo vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

Vivo vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

Vivo
46score / 100
10 wins · 11 tied

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

Tecno Spark SlimVivo vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Display 38 52
Battery 18 57
Performance 45 81
Camera 20 34
Design 68 66
Platform 9 9
Features 50 50

How to choose

Pick the Tecno Spark Slim if you care about…

  • Weight 156 g +71 g vs 227 g
  • Thickness 5.9 mm +2.8 mm vs 8.7 mm
  • Width 75.9 mm +0.9 mm vs 76.8 mm

Pick the Vivo vivo iQOO 15 Ultra if you care about…

  • Screen size 6.8 in +0.1 in vs 6.8 in
  • Peak brightness 8000 nits +3500 nits vs 4500 nits
  • Pixel density 508 ppi +68 ppi vs 440 ppi
  • Battery capacity 7400 mAh +2240 mAh vs 5160 mAh

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

15 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

Tecno Spark SlimVivo vivo iQOO 15 UltraWhere they differ
Peak brightness 4500 nits8000 nits Vivo vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Pixel density 440 ppi508 ppi Vivo vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Battery capacity 5160 mAh7400 mAh Vivo vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Wired charging 45 W100 W Vivo vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Wireless charging —✓ Vivo vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
RAM 8 GB16 GB Vivo vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Chipset Helio G200Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Depends
OS Android 15Android 16 Depends
Selfie camera 13 MP32 MP Vivo vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Weight 156 g227 g Tecno Spark Slim
Thickness 5.9 mm8.7 mm Tecno Spark Slim
Water resistant (IP68) —✓ Vivo vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Length 164.2 mm163.7 mm Vivo vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Width 75.9 mm76.8 mm Tecno Spark Slim
Colors Slim White, Cool BlackBlack, Silver Depends

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Display5▾
Tecno Spark SlimVivo vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Screen size 6.8 in 6.8 in
Peak brightness 4500 nits 8000 nits
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Pixel density 440 ppi 508 ppi
Display type AMOLED AMOLED
Battery4▾
Tecno Spark SlimVivo vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Battery capacity 5160 mAh 7400 mAh
Wired charging 45 W 100 W
Wireless charging power — 40 W
Wireless charging — ✓
Performance4▾
Tecno Spark SlimVivo vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
RAM 8 GB 16 GB
Chipset Helio G200 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
OS Android 15 Android 16
Storage 256 GB 256 GB
Camera2▾
Tecno Spark SlimVivo vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Selfie camera 13 MP 32 MP
Design6▾
Tecno Spark SlimVivo vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Weight 156 g 227 g
Thickness 5.9 mm 8.7 mm
Water resistant (IP68) — ✓
Length 164.2 mm 163.7 mm
Width 75.9 mm 76.8 mm
Colors Slim White, Cool Black Black, Silver
Memory1▾
Tecno Spark SlimVivo vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Memory card slot — —
Platform1▾
Tecno Spark SlimVivo vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
CPU cores 8 8
Features2▾
Tecno Spark SlimVivo vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Face unlock — —
Fingerprint sensor ✓ ✓

Data sources: GSMArena

FAQ

Which is better, Tecno Spark Slim or Vivo vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

Vivo vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the higher overall score (46 vs 31) and leads in Display, Battery, Performance. Choose Tecno Spark Slim instead if Weight matters more to you.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Peak brightness (4500 nits vs 8000 nits) · Pixel density (440 ppi vs 508 ppi) · Battery capacity (5160 mAh vs 7400 mAh).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 25 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.