TN The University of Tennessee-Knoxville vs TX The University of Texas at Arlington
TN The University of Tennessee-Knoxville — Pick the TN The University of Tennessee-Knoxville — it leads these groups: Admissions 2
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
TN The University of Tennessee-Knoxville wins this comparison with a score of 46/100, ahead of TX The University of Texas at Arlington (44).
The main differences: Acceptance rate (41.6 % vs 79.9 %) · Average SAT (1311 vs 1124) · Average ACT (28 vs 23).
Scores are computed from 12 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| TN The University of Tennessee-Knoxville | TX The University of Texas at Arlington | |
|---|---|---|
| Admissions | 53 | 49 |
| Cost & outcomes | 55 | 50 |
| Students & campus | 19 | 20 |
How to choose
Pick the TN The University of Tennessee-Knoxville if you care about…
- Average SAT 1311 +187 vs 1124
- Average ACT 28 +5 vs 23
- Graduation rate (150%) 73.9 % +19.9 % vs 54.0 %
- Freshman retention 91.9 % +19.0 % vs 72.9 %
Pick the TX The University of Texas at Arlington if you care about…
- Acceptance rate 79.9 % +38.3 % vs 41.6 %
- In-state tuition 11950 USD/yr +1862 USD/yr vs 13812 USD/yr
- Out-of-state tuition 29582 USD/yr +3674 USD/yr vs 33256 USD/yr
- Median earnings (10 yr) 63199 USD +2950 USD vs 60249 USD
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Where they differ
10 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| TN The University of Tennessee-Knoxville | TX The University of Texas at Arlington | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acceptance rate | 41.6 % | 79.9 % | TX The University of Texas at Arlington |
| Average SAT | 1311 | 1124 | TN The University of Tennessee-Knoxville |
| Average ACT | 28 | 23 | TN The University of Tennessee-Knoxville |
| In-state tuition | 13812 USD/yr | 11950 USD/yr | TX The University of Texas at Arlington |
| Out-of-state tuition | 33256 USD/yr | 29582 USD/yr | TX The University of Texas at Arlington |
| Median earnings (10 yr) | 60249 USD | 63199 USD | TX The University of Texas at Arlington |
| Earnings >$50k (10 yr) | 76.4 % | 79.2 % | TX The University of Texas at Arlington |
| Graduation rate (150%) | 73.9 % | 54.0 % | TN The University of Tennessee-Knoxville |
| Freshman retention | 91.9 % | 72.9 % | TN The University of Tennessee-Knoxville |
| Undergraduate students | 30418 | 32294 | TX The University of Texas at Arlington |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Admissions3▾
| TN The University of Tennessee-Knoxville | TX The University of Texas at Arlington | |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptance rate | 41.6 % | 79.9 % |
| Average SAT | 1311 | 1124 |
| Average ACT | 28 | 23 |
Cost & outcomes6▾
| TN The University of Tennessee-Knoxville | TX The University of Texas at Arlington | |
|---|---|---|
| In-state tuition | 13812 USD/yr | 11950 USD/yr |
| Out-of-state tuition | 33256 USD/yr | 29582 USD/yr |
| Median earnings (10 yr) | 60249 USD | 63199 USD |
| Earnings >$50k (10 yr) | 76.4 % | 79.2 % |
| Graduation rate (150%) | 73.9 % | 54.0 % |
| Freshman retention | 91.9 % | 72.9 % |
Students & campus3▾
| TN The University of Tennessee-Knoxville | TX The University of Texas at Arlington | |
|---|---|---|
| Undergraduate students | 30418 | 32294 |
| Campus setting | City | City |
| Ownership | Public | Public |
Data sources: College Scorecard
FAQ
Which is better, TN The University of Tennessee-Knoxville or TX The University of Texas at Arlington?
TN The University of Tennessee-Knoxville edges ahead 46 to 44 and leads in Admissions. Choose TX The University of Texas at Arlington instead if Acceptance rate matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Acceptance rate (41.6 % vs 79.9 %) · Average SAT (1311 vs 1124) · Average ACT (28 vs 23).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 12 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.