Archer Axe300 vs Archer Be800
Archer Be800 — Pick the Archer Be800 — it leads these groups: Wireless 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Archer Be800 wins this comparison with a score of 64/100, ahead of Archer Axe300 (62).
The main differences: Wi-Fi speed (16000 Mb/s vs 19000 Mb/s).
Scores are computed from 3 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Archer Be800 if you care about…
- Wi-Fi speed 19000 Mb/s +3000 Mb/s vs 16000 Mb/s
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
ASUS RT-BE88U
Amazon Eero Pro 6
ASUS Asus TUF Gaming BE3600
ASUS Asus TUF Gaming AX4200
ASUS Asus TUF Gaming AX3000 V2
ASUS Asus RT-BE82U
Where they differ
1 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Archer Axe300 | Archer Be800 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wi-Fi speed | 16000 Mb/s | 19000 Mb/s | Archer Be800 |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Wireless1▾
| Archer Axe300 | Archer Be800 | |
|---|---|---|
| Wi-Fi speed | 16000 Mb/s | 19000 Mb/s |
Hardware1▾
| Archer Axe300 | Archer Be800 | |
|---|---|---|
| External antennas | 8 | 8 |
Ports1▾
| Archer Axe300 | Archer Be800 | |
|---|---|---|
| LAN ports | 7 | 7 |
Data sources: Amazon
FAQ
Which is better, Archer Axe300 or Archer Be800?
Archer Be800 edges ahead 64 to 62 and leads in Wireless.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Wi-Fi speed (16000 Mb/s vs 19000 Mb/s).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 3 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.