IL University of Illinois Chicago vs IL University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
IL University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign — Pick the IL University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign — it leads these groups: Cost & outcomes 4 Admissions 2 Students & campus 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
IL University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign wins this comparison with a score of 52/100, ahead of IL University of Illinois Chicago (47).
The main differences: Acceptance rate (77.3 % vs 42.4 %) · Average SAT (1250 vs 1440) · Average ACT (27 vs 32).
Scores are computed from 12 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| IL University of Illinois Chicago | IL University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign | |
|---|---|---|
| Admissions | 62 | 67 |
| Cost & outcomes | 53 | 60 |
| Students & campus | 14 | 22 |
How to choose
Pick the IL University of Illinois Chicago if you care about…
- Acceptance rate 77.3 % +35.0 % vs 42.4 %
- In-state tuition 14338 USD/yr +1666 USD/yr vs 16004 USD/yr
- Out-of-state tuition 29884 USD/yr +5240 USD/yr vs 35124 USD/yr
Pick the IL University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign if you care about…
- Average SAT 1440 +190 vs 1250
- Average ACT 32 +5 vs 27
- Median earnings (10 yr) 81054 USD +12314 USD vs 68740 USD
- Earnings >$50k (10 yr) 87 % +6.1 % vs 80.9 %
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Where they differ
10 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| IL University of Illinois Chicago | IL University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acceptance rate | 77.3 % | 42.4 % | IL University of Illinois Chicago |
| Average SAT | 1250 | 1440 | IL University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign |
| Average ACT | 27 | 32 | IL University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign |
| In-state tuition | 14338 USD/yr | 16004 USD/yr | IL University of Illinois Chicago |
| Out-of-state tuition | 29884 USD/yr | 35124 USD/yr | IL University of Illinois Chicago |
| Median earnings (10 yr) | 68740 USD | 81054 USD | IL University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign |
| Earnings >$50k (10 yr) | 80.9 % | 87 % | IL University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign |
| Graduation rate (150%) | 61.6 % | 85.1 % | IL University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign |
| Freshman retention | 80.2 % | 94.8 % | IL University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign |
| Undergraduate students | 22170 | 36258 | IL University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Admissions3▾
| IL University of Illinois Chicago | IL University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign | |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptance rate | 77.3 % | 42.4 % |
| Average SAT | 1250 | 1440 |
| Average ACT | 27 | 32 |
Cost & outcomes6▾
| IL University of Illinois Chicago | IL University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign | |
|---|---|---|
| In-state tuition | 14338 USD/yr | 16004 USD/yr |
| Out-of-state tuition | 29884 USD/yr | 35124 USD/yr |
| Median earnings (10 yr) | 68740 USD | 81054 USD |
| Earnings >$50k (10 yr) | 80.9 % | 87 % |
| Graduation rate (150%) | 61.6 % | 85.1 % |
| Freshman retention | 80.2 % | 94.8 % |
Students & campus3▾
| IL University of Illinois Chicago | IL University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign | |
|---|---|---|
| Undergraduate students | 22170 | 36258 |
| Campus setting | City | City |
| Ownership | Public | Public |
Data sources: College Scorecard
FAQ
Which is better, IL University of Illinois Chicago or IL University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign?
IL University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign has the higher overall score (52 vs 47) and leads in Cost & outcomes, Admissions, Students & campus. Choose IL University of Illinois Chicago instead if Acceptance rate matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Acceptance rate (77.3 % vs 42.4 %) · Average SAT (1250 vs 1440) · Average ACT (27 vs 32).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 12 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.