MD University of Maryland Global Campus vs MA University of Massachusetts-Amherst
MA University of Massachusetts-Amherst — Pick the MA University of Massachusetts-Amherst — it leads these groups: Cost & outcomes 4
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
MA University of Massachusetts-Amherst wins this comparison with a score of 50/100, ahead of MD University of Maryland Global Campus (49).
The main differences: In-state tuition (8136 USD/yr vs 17772 USD/yr) · Out-of-state tuition (12336 USD/yr vs 40449 USD/yr) · Median earnings (10 yr) (65287 USD vs 71631 USD).
Scores are computed from 12 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| MD University of Maryland Global Campus | MA University of Massachusetts-Amherst | |
|---|---|---|
| Admissions | 63 | 71 |
| Cost & outcomes | 49 | 56 |
| Students & campus | 30 | 14 |
How to choose
Pick the MD University of Maryland Global Campus if you care about…
- In-state tuition 8136 USD/yr +9636 USD/yr vs 17772 USD/yr
- Out-of-state tuition 12336 USD/yr +28113 USD/yr vs 40449 USD/yr
- Undergraduate students 49664 +25993 vs 23671
Pick the MA University of Massachusetts-Amherst if you care about…
- Median earnings (10 yr) 71631 USD +6344 USD vs 65287 USD
- Earnings >$50k (10 yr) 81.7 % +6.5 % vs 75.2 %
- Graduation rate (150%) 83.3 % +49.9 % vs 33.3 %
- Freshman retention 91.9 % +36.5 % vs 55.4 %
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Where they differ
8 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| MD University of Maryland Global Campus | MA University of Massachusetts-Amherst | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| In-state tuition | 8136 USD/yr | 17772 USD/yr | MD University of Maryland Global Campus |
| Out-of-state tuition | 12336 USD/yr | 40449 USD/yr | MD University of Maryland Global Campus |
| Median earnings (10 yr) | 65287 USD | 71631 USD | MA University of Massachusetts-Amherst |
| Earnings >$50k (10 yr) | 75.2 % | 81.7 % | MA University of Massachusetts-Amherst |
| Graduation rate (150%) | 33.3 % | 83.3 % | MA University of Massachusetts-Amherst |
| Freshman retention | 55.4 % | 91.9 % | MA University of Massachusetts-Amherst |
| Undergraduate students | 49664 | 23671 | MD University of Maryland Global Campus |
| Campus setting | Suburban | City | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Admissions3▾
| MD University of Maryland Global Campus | MA University of Massachusetts-Amherst | |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptance rate | — | 59.7 % |
| Average SAT | — | 1423 |
| Average ACT | — | 31 |
Cost & outcomes6▾
| MD University of Maryland Global Campus | MA University of Massachusetts-Amherst | |
|---|---|---|
| In-state tuition | 8136 USD/yr | 17772 USD/yr |
| Out-of-state tuition | 12336 USD/yr | 40449 USD/yr |
| Median earnings (10 yr) | 65287 USD | 71631 USD |
| Earnings >$50k (10 yr) | 75.2 % | 81.7 % |
| Graduation rate (150%) | 33.3 % | 83.3 % |
| Freshman retention | 55.4 % | 91.9 % |
Students & campus3▾
| MD University of Maryland Global Campus | MA University of Massachusetts-Amherst | |
|---|---|---|
| Undergraduate students | 49664 | 23671 |
| Campus setting | Suburban | City |
| Ownership | Public | Public |
Data sources: College Scorecard
FAQ
Which is better, MD University of Maryland Global Campus or MA University of Massachusetts-Amherst?
MA University of Massachusetts-Amherst edges ahead 50 to 49 and leads in Cost & outcomes. Choose MD University of Maryland Global Campus instead if In-state tuition matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: In-state tuition (8136 USD/yr vs 17772 USD/yr) · Out-of-state tuition (12336 USD/yr vs 40449 USD/yr) · Median earnings (10 yr) (65287 USD vs 71631 USD).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 12 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.