MA University of Massachusetts-Boston vs MA University of Massachusetts-Lowell
MA University of Massachusetts-Lowell — Pick the MA University of Massachusetts-Lowell — it leads these groups: Cost & outcomes 4 Admissions 2
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
MA University of Massachusetts-Lowell wins this comparison with a score of 47/100, ahead of MA University of Massachusetts-Boston (44).
The main differences: Acceptance rate (83.8 % vs 83.0 %) · Average SAT (1194 vs 1285) · Average ACT (27 vs 29).
Scores are computed from 12 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| MA University of Massachusetts-Boston | MA University of Massachusetts-Lowell | |
|---|---|---|
| Admissions | 61 | 69 |
| Cost & outcomes | 47 | 52 |
| Students & campus | 7 | 7 |
How to choose
Pick the MA University of Massachusetts-Boston if you care about…
- Acceptance rate 83.8 % +0.7 % vs 83.0 %
- In-state tuition 15908 USD/yr +1058 USD/yr vs 16966 USD/yr
- Median earnings (10 yr) 65865 USD +991 USD vs 64874 USD
- Undergraduate students 11512 +78 vs 11434
Pick the MA University of Massachusetts-Lowell if you care about…
- Average SAT 1285 +91 vs 1194
- Average ACT 29 +2 vs 27
- Out-of-state tuition 36264 USD/yr +1861 USD/yr vs 38125 USD/yr
- Earnings >$50k (10 yr) 81.2 % +4.7 % vs 76.5 %
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Where they differ
11 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| MA University of Massachusetts-Boston | MA University of Massachusetts-Lowell | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acceptance rate | 83.8 % | 83.0 % | MA University of Massachusetts-Boston |
| Average SAT | 1194 | 1285 | MA University of Massachusetts-Lowell |
| Average ACT | 27 | 29 | MA University of Massachusetts-Lowell |
| In-state tuition | 15908 USD/yr | 16966 USD/yr | MA University of Massachusetts-Boston |
| Out-of-state tuition | 38125 USD/yr | 36264 USD/yr | MA University of Massachusetts-Lowell |
| Median earnings (10 yr) | 65865 USD | 64874 USD | MA University of Massachusetts-Boston |
| Earnings >$50k (10 yr) | 76.5 % | 81.2 % | MA University of Massachusetts-Lowell |
| Graduation rate (150%) | 49.4 % | 64.8 % | MA University of Massachusetts-Lowell |
| Freshman retention | 70.4 % | 84.0 % | MA University of Massachusetts-Lowell |
| Undergraduate students | 11512 | 11434 | MA University of Massachusetts-Boston |
| Campus setting | City | Suburban | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Admissions3▾
| MA University of Massachusetts-Boston | MA University of Massachusetts-Lowell | |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptance rate | 83.8 % | 83.0 % |
| Average SAT | 1194 | 1285 |
| Average ACT | 27 | 29 |
Cost & outcomes6▾
| MA University of Massachusetts-Boston | MA University of Massachusetts-Lowell | |
|---|---|---|
| In-state tuition | 15908 USD/yr | 16966 USD/yr |
| Out-of-state tuition | 38125 USD/yr | 36264 USD/yr |
| Median earnings (10 yr) | 65865 USD | 64874 USD |
| Earnings >$50k (10 yr) | 76.5 % | 81.2 % |
| Graduation rate (150%) | 49.4 % | 64.8 % |
| Freshman retention | 70.4 % | 84.0 % |
Students & campus3▾
| MA University of Massachusetts-Boston | MA University of Massachusetts-Lowell | |
|---|---|---|
| Undergraduate students | 11512 | 11434 |
| Campus setting | City | Suburban |
| Ownership | Public | Public |
Data sources: College Scorecard
FAQ
Which is better, MA University of Massachusetts-Boston or MA University of Massachusetts-Lowell?
MA University of Massachusetts-Lowell has the higher overall score (47 vs 44) and leads in Cost & outcomes, Admissions. Choose MA University of Massachusetts-Boston instead if Acceptance rate matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Acceptance rate (83.8 % vs 83.0 %) · Average SAT (1194 vs 1285) · Average ACT (27 vs 29).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 12 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.