EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

MI University of Michigan-Ann Arbor vs MN University of Minnesota-Twin Cities

🏆 Settled

MI University of Michigan-Ann Arbor — Pick the MI University of Michigan-Ann Arbor — it leads these groups: Cost & outcomes 4 Students & campus 1

Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public

The short answer

MI University of Michigan-Ann Arbor wins this comparison with a score of 56/100, ahead of MN University of Minnesota-Twin Cities (52).

The main differences: Acceptance rate (15.6 % vs 79.8 %) · Average SAT (1465 vs 1362) · In-state tuition (17736 USD/yr vs 17214 USD/yr).

Scores are computed from 16 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

🏆 Overall winner

MI University of Michigan-Ann Arbor

MI
56score / 100
6 wins · 8 tied

MN University of Minnesota-Twin Cities

MN
52score / 100
3 wins · 11 tied

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

MI University of Michigan-Ann ArborMN University of Minnesota-Twin Cities
Admissions 54 74
Cost & outcomes 56 57
Rankings 80 48
Students & campus 21 20

How to choose

Pick the MI University of Michigan-Ann Arbor if you care about…

  • Average SAT 1465 +103 vs 1362
  • Median earnings (10 yr) 83648 USD +14628 USD vs 69020 USD
  • Earnings >$50k (10 yr) 85.2 % +2.1 % vs 83.1 %
  • Graduation rate (150%) 93.2 % +7.9 % vs 85.3 %

Pick the MN University of Minnesota-Twin Cities if you care about…

  • Acceptance rate 79.8 % +64.1 % vs 15.6 %
  • In-state tuition 17214 USD/yr +522 USD/yr vs 17736 USD/yr
  • Out-of-state tuition 38362 USD/yr +22584 USD/yr vs 60946 USD/yr

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

9 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

MI University of Michigan-Ann ArborMN University of Minnesota-Twin CitiesWhere they differ
Acceptance rate 15.6 %79.8 % MN University of Minnesota-Twin Cities
Average SAT 14651362 MI University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
In-state tuition 17736 USD/yr17214 USD/yr MN University of Minnesota-Twin Cities
Out-of-state tuition 60946 USD/yr38362 USD/yr MN University of Minnesota-Twin Cities
Median earnings (10 yr) 83648 USD69020 USD MI University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
Earnings >$50k (10 yr) 85.2 %83.1 % MI University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
Graduation rate (150%) 93.2 %85.3 % MI University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
Freshman retention 97.5 %91.1 % MI University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
Undergraduate students 3417731855 MI University of Michigan-Ann Arbor

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Admissions3▾
MI University of Michigan-Ann ArborMN University of Minnesota-Twin Cities
Acceptance rate 15.6 % 79.8 %
Average SAT 1465 1362
Average ACT — 30
Cost & outcomes6▾
MI University of Michigan-Ann ArborMN University of Minnesota-Twin Cities
In-state tuition 17736 USD/yr 17214 USD/yr
Out-of-state tuition 60946 USD/yr 38362 USD/yr
Median earnings (10 yr) 83648 USD 69020 USD
Earnings >$50k (10 yr) 85.2 % 83.1 %
Graduation rate (150%) 93.2 % 85.3 %
Freshman retention 97.5 % 91.1 %
Rankings4▾
MI University of Michigan-Ann ArborMN University of Minnesota-Twin Cities
THE world rank 23 —
THE overall score 86.9 —
THE teaching 85.7 —
THE research 87.3 —
Students & campus3▾
MI University of Michigan-Ann ArborMN University of Minnesota-Twin Cities
Undergraduate students 34177 31855
Campus setting City City
Ownership Public Public

Data sources: College Scorecard · Times Higher Education

FAQ

Which is better, MI University of Michigan-Ann Arbor or MN University of Minnesota-Twin Cities?

MI University of Michigan-Ann Arbor has the higher overall score (56 vs 52) and leads in Cost & outcomes, Students & campus. Choose MN University of Minnesota-Twin Cities instead if Acceptance rate matters more to you.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Acceptance rate (15.6 % vs 79.8 %) · Average SAT (1465 vs 1362) · In-state tuition (17736 USD/yr vs 17214 USD/yr).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 16 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.