PA University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus vs RI University of Rhode Island
PA University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus — Pick the PA University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus — it leads these groups: Admissions 2 Students & campus 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
PA University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus wins this comparison with a score of 49/100, ahead of RI University of Rhode Island (45).
The main differences: Acceptance rate (58.1 % vs 72.2 %) · Average SAT (1370 vs 1160) · Average ACT (31 vs 28).
Scores are computed from 12 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
| PA University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus | RI University of Rhode Island | |
|---|---|---|
| Admissions | 68 | 57 |
| Cost & outcomes | 55 | 54 |
| Students & campus | 12 | 8 |
How to choose
Pick the PA University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus if you care about…
- Average SAT 1370 +210 vs 1160
- Average ACT 31 +3 vs 28
- Earnings >$50k (10 yr) 83 % +1.7 % vs 81.3 %
- Graduation rate (150%) 85.5 % +12.2 % vs 73.3 %
Pick the RI University of Rhode Island if you care about…
- Acceptance rate 72.2 % +14.1 % vs 58.1 %
- In-state tuition 16942 USD/yr +4984 USD/yr vs 21926 USD/yr
- Out-of-state tuition 37146 USD/yr +4284 USD/yr vs 41430 USD/yr
- Median earnings (10 yr) 69743 USD +3618 USD vs 66125 USD
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Where they differ
11 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| PA University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus | RI University of Rhode Island | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acceptance rate | 58.1 % | 72.2 % | RI University of Rhode Island |
| Average SAT | 1370 | 1160 | PA University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus |
| Average ACT | 31 | 28 | PA University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus |
| In-state tuition | 21926 USD/yr | 16942 USD/yr | RI University of Rhode Island |
| Out-of-state tuition | 41430 USD/yr | 37146 USD/yr | RI University of Rhode Island |
| Median earnings (10 yr) | 66125 USD | 69743 USD | RI University of Rhode Island |
| Earnings >$50k (10 yr) | 83 % | 81.3 % | PA University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus |
| Graduation rate (150%) | 85.5 % | 73.3 % | PA University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus |
| Freshman retention | 92.0 % | 83.6 % | PA University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus |
| Undergraduate students | 20370 | 13381 | PA University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus |
| Campus setting | City | Suburban | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Admissions3▾
| PA University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus | RI University of Rhode Island | |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptance rate | 58.1 % | 72.2 % |
| Average SAT | 1370 | 1160 |
| Average ACT | 31 | 28 |
Cost & outcomes6▾
| PA University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus | RI University of Rhode Island | |
|---|---|---|
| In-state tuition | 21926 USD/yr | 16942 USD/yr |
| Out-of-state tuition | 41430 USD/yr | 37146 USD/yr |
| Median earnings (10 yr) | 66125 USD | 69743 USD |
| Earnings >$50k (10 yr) | 83 % | 81.3 % |
| Graduation rate (150%) | 85.5 % | 73.3 % |
| Freshman retention | 92.0 % | 83.6 % |
Students & campus3▾
| PA University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus | RI University of Rhode Island | |
|---|---|---|
| Undergraduate students | 20370 | 13381 |
| Campus setting | City | Suburban |
| Ownership | Public | Public |
Data sources: College Scorecard
FAQ
Which is better, PA University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus or RI University of Rhode Island?
PA University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus has the higher overall score (49 vs 45) and leads in Admissions, Students & campus. Choose RI University of Rhode Island instead if Acceptance rate matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Acceptance rate (58.1 % vs 72.2 %) · Average SAT (1370 vs 1160) · Average ACT (31 vs 28).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 12 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.