Vivo vivo T5 Lite vs Vivo vivo T5 Pro
Vivo vivo T5 Pro — Pick the Vivo vivo T5 Pro — it leads these groups: Display 4 Design 3 Battery 2
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Vivo vivo T5 Pro wins this comparison with a score of 38/100, ahead of Vivo vivo T5 Lite (36).
The main differences: Screen size (6.7 in vs 6.8 in) · Peak brightness (1200 nits vs 5000 nits) · Refresh rate (120 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Scores are computed from 24 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Vivo vivo T5 Lite if you care about…
- Weight 209 g +4 g vs 213 g
- Memory card slot ✓ vs —
Pick the Vivo vivo T5 Pro if you care about…
- Screen size 6.8 in +0.1 in vs 6.7 in
- Peak brightness 5000 nits +3800 nits vs 1200 nits
- Refresh rate 144 Hz +24 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Pixel density 450 ppi +190 ppi vs 260 ppi
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
OnePlus 13
OnePlus 15
vivo X Fold6
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 10a
Where they differ
16 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Vivo vivo T5 Lite | Vivo vivo T5 Pro | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 in | 6.8 in | Vivo vivo T5 Pro |
| Peak brightness | 1200 nits | 5000 nits | Vivo vivo T5 Pro |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | Vivo vivo T5 Pro |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 450 ppi | Vivo vivo T5 Pro |
| Display type | IPS LCD | AMOLED | Depends |
| Battery capacity | 6500 mAh | 9020 mAh | Vivo vivo T5 Pro |
| Wired charging | 44 W | 90 W | Vivo vivo T5 Pro |
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB | Vivo vivo T5 Pro |
| Chipset | Dimensity 6300 | Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 | Depends |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | Vivo vivo T5 Pro |
| Weight | 209 g | 213 g | Vivo vivo T5 Lite |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.3 mm | Vivo vivo T5 Pro |
| Length | 167.4 mm | 163.7 mm | Vivo vivo T5 Pro |
| Width | 77.1 mm | 76.2 mm | Vivo vivo T5 Pro |
| Colors | Twilight Shadow, Wave Blue | Cosmic Black, Glacier Blue | Depends |
| Memory card slot | ✓ | — | Vivo vivo T5 Lite |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| Vivo vivo T5 Lite | Vivo vivo T5 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 in | 6.8 in |
| Peak brightness | 1200 nits | 5000 nits |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Display type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
Battery3▾
| Vivo vivo T5 Lite | Vivo vivo T5 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 6500 mAh | 9020 mAh |
| Wired charging | 44 W | 90 W |
| Wireless charging | — | — |
Performance4▾
| Vivo vivo T5 Lite | Vivo vivo T5 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Chipset | Dimensity 6300 | Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB |
Camera2▾
| Vivo vivo T5 Lite | Vivo vivo T5 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 32 MP |
Design6▾
| Vivo vivo T5 Lite | Vivo vivo T5 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 209 g | 213 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Length | 167.4 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 77.1 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Colors | Twilight Shadow, Wave Blue | Cosmic Black, Glacier Blue |
Memory1▾
| Vivo vivo T5 Lite | Vivo vivo T5 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | ✓ | — |
Platform1▾
| Vivo vivo T5 Lite | Vivo vivo T5 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
Features2▾
| Vivo vivo T5 Lite | Vivo vivo T5 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | — | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | ✓ | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Vivo vivo T5 Lite or Vivo vivo T5 Pro?
Vivo vivo T5 Pro edges ahead 38 to 36 and leads in Display, Design, Battery. Choose Vivo vivo T5 Lite instead if Weight matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (6.7 in vs 6.8 in) · Peak brightness (1200 nits vs 5000 nits) · Refresh rate (120 Hz vs 144 Hz).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 24 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.