Vivo vivo Y32 (2026) vs vivo X Fold5
The short answer
Vivo vivo Y32 (2026) wins this comparison with a score of 40/100, ahead of vivo X Fold5 (36).
The main differences: Screen size (6.9 in vs 8.0 in) · Display type (IPS LCD vs 主：AMOLED副：AMOLED) · Battery capacity (8000 mAh vs 6000 mAh).
Scores are computed from 25 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Vivo vivo Y32 (2026) if you care about…
- Battery capacity 8000 mAh +2000 mAh vs 6000 mAh
- Width 79.2 mm +63.1 mm vs 142.3 mm
Pick the vivo X Fold5 if you care about…
- Screen size 8.0 in +1.2 in vs 6.9 in
- Wired charging 80 W +36 W vs 44 W
- Weight 226 g +3 g vs 229 g
- Thickness 4.5 mm +4.1 mm vs 8.7 mm
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
OnePlus 13
OnePlus 15
vivo X Fold6
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 10a
Where they differ
11 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Vivo vivo Y32 (2026) | vivo X Fold5 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 in | 8.0 in | vivo X Fold5 |
| Display type | IPS LCD | 主：AMOLED副：AMOLED | Depends |
| Battery capacity | 8000 mAh | 6000 mAh | Vivo vivo Y32 (2026) |
| Wired charging | 44 W | 80 W | vivo X Fold5 |
| OS | Android 16 | OriginOS 5 | Depends |
| Weight | 229 g | 226 g | vivo X Fold5 |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 4.5 mm | vivo X Fold5 |
| Length | 169.6 mm | 159.7 mm | vivo X Fold5 |
| Width | 79.2 mm | 142.3 mm | Vivo vivo Y32 (2026) |
| Colors | Twilight Red, Sunset Orange | 明白，青松，钛度 查看外观 | Depends |
| Face unlock | — | ✓ | vivo X Fold5 |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| Vivo vivo Y32 (2026) | vivo X Fold5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 in | 8.0 in |
| Peak brightness | 1300 nits | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Pixel density | 254 ppi | — |
| Display type | IPS LCD | 主：AMOLED副：AMOLED |
Battery3▾
| Vivo vivo Y32 (2026) | vivo X Fold5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 8000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 44 W | 80 W |
| Wireless charging | — | — |
Performance4▾
| Vivo vivo Y32 (2026) | vivo X Fold5 | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 4 GB | — |
| Chipset | Unisoc T7300 | — |
| OS | Android 16 | OriginOS 5 |
| Storage | 128 GB | — |
Camera2▾
| Vivo vivo Y32 (2026) | vivo X Fold5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | — |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | — |
Design7▾
| Vivo vivo Y32 (2026) | vivo X Fold5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 229 g | 226 g |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 4.5 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | ✓ | — |
| Length | 169.6 mm | 159.7 mm |
| Width | 79.2 mm | 142.3 mm |
| Colors | Twilight Red, Sunset Orange | 明白，青松，钛度 查看外观 |
| Body material | — | 中框材质：铝合金 查看外观图 |
Memory1▾
| Vivo vivo Y32 (2026) | vivo X Fold5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | ✓ | — |
Platform1▾
| Vivo vivo Y32 (2026) | vivo X Fold5 | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
Features2▾
| Vivo vivo Y32 (2026) | vivo X Fold5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | — | ✓ |
| Fingerprint sensor | ✓ | — |
FAQ
Which is better, Vivo vivo Y32 (2026) or vivo X Fold5?
Vivo vivo Y32 (2026) has the higher overall score (40 vs 36). Choose vivo X Fold5 instead if Screen size matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (6.9 in vs 8.0 in) · Display type (IPS LCD vs 主：AMOLED副：AMOLED) · Battery capacity (8000 mAh vs 6000 mAh).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 25 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.