Vivo vivo X200T vs vivo X300
vivo X300 — Pick the vivo X300 — it leads these groups: Design 4 Features 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
vivo X300 wins this comparison with a score of 41/100, ahead of Vivo vivo X200T (40).
The main differences: Screen size (6.7 in vs 6.3 in) · Battery capacity (6200 mAh vs 6040 mAh) · OS (Android 16 vs OriginOS 6).
Scores are computed from 26 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Vivo vivo X200T if you care about…
- Screen size 6.7 in +0.4 in vs 6.3 in
- Battery capacity 6200 mAh +160 mAh vs 6040 mAh
Pick the vivo X300 if you care about…
- Weight 190 g +15 g vs 205 g
- Thickness 8.0 mm +0.0 mm vs 8 mm
- Length 150.6 mm +9.4 mm vs 160 mm
- Width 71.9 mm +2.4 mm vs 74.3 mm
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Where they differ
9 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Vivo vivo X200T | vivo X300 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 in | 6.3 in | Vivo vivo X200T |
| Battery capacity | 6200 mAh | 6040 mAh | Vivo vivo X200T |
| OS | Android 16 | OriginOS 6 | Depends |
| Weight | 205 g | 190 g | vivo X300 |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.0 mm | vivo X300 |
| Length | 160 mm | 150.6 mm | vivo X300 |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 71.9 mm | vivo X300 |
| Colors | Seaside Lilac, Stellar Black | 幸运彩,自在蓝,惬意紫,纯粹黑 查看外观 | Depends |
| Face unlock | — | ✓ | vivo X300 |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| Vivo vivo X200T | vivo X300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 in | 6.3 in |
| Peak brightness | 5000 nits | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | — |
| Display type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
Battery4▾
| Vivo vivo X200T | vivo X300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 6200 mAh | 6040 mAh |
| Wired charging | 90 W | 90 W |
| Wireless charging power | 40 W | — |
| Wireless charging | ✓ | ✓ |
Performance4▾
| Vivo vivo X200T | vivo X300 | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 12 GB | — |
| Chipset | Dimensity 9400+ | — |
| OS | Android 16 | OriginOS 6 |
| Storage | 256 GB | — |
Camera2▾
| Vivo vivo X200T | vivo X300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | — |
Design7▾
| Vivo vivo X200T | vivo X300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 205 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.0 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | ✓ | — |
| Length | 160 mm | 150.6 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 71.9 mm |
| Colors | Seaside Lilac, Stellar Black | 幸运彩,自在蓝,惬意紫,纯粹黑 查看外观 |
| Body material | — | 中框材质:铝合金 后盖材质:玻璃 查看外观图 |
Memory1▾
| Vivo vivo X200T | vivo X300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | — | — |
Platform1▾
| Vivo vivo X200T | vivo X300 | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
Features2▾
| Vivo vivo X200T | vivo X300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | — | ✓ |
| Fingerprint sensor | ✓ | — |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Vivo vivo X200T or vivo X300?
vivo X300 edges ahead 41 to 40 and leads in Design, Features. Choose Vivo vivo X200T instead if Screen size matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (6.7 in vs 6.3 in) · Battery capacity (6200 mAh vs 6040 mAh) · OS (Android 16 vs OriginOS 6).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 26 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.
vivo X Fold6
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold