Vivo vivo X300 E vs Vivo vivo X300 FE
Vivo vivo X300 FE — Pick the Vivo vivo X300 FE — it leads these groups: Design 3
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Vivo vivo X300 FE wins this comparison with a score of 43/100, ahead of Vivo vivo X300 E (41).
The main differences: Screen size (6.6 in vs 6.3 in) · Refresh rate (144 Hz vs 120 Hz) · Pixel density (459 ppi vs 461 ppi).
Scores are computed from 25 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Vivo vivo X300 E if you care about…
- Screen size 6.6 in +0.3 in vs 6.3 in
- Refresh rate 144 Hz +24 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Battery capacity 7200 mAh +700 mAh vs 6500 mAh
- Thickness 7.8 mm +0.4 mm vs 8.2 mm
Pick the Vivo vivo X300 FE if you care about…
- Pixel density 461 ppi +2 ppi vs 459 ppi
- Wireless charging ✓ vs —
- Weight 190.2 g +12.8 g vs 203 g
- Length 150.8 mm +6.7 mm vs 157.5 mm
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
vivo X Fold6
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 10a
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Where they differ
11 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Vivo vivo X300 E | Vivo vivo X300 FE | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.6 in | 6.3 in | Vivo vivo X300 E |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | Vivo vivo X300 E |
| Pixel density | 459 ppi | 461 ppi | Vivo vivo X300 FE |
| Display type | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED | Depends |
| Battery capacity | 7200 mAh | 6500 mAh | Vivo vivo X300 E |
| Wireless charging | — | ✓ | Vivo vivo X300 FE |
| Weight | 203 g | 190.2 g | Vivo vivo X300 FE |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.2 mm | Vivo vivo X300 E |
| Length | 157.5 mm | 150.8 mm | Vivo vivo X300 FE |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 71.8 mm | Vivo vivo X300 FE |
| Colors | White, Gray, Orange | Misty Purple (Lilac Purple), Radiant White, Cool Black (Noir Black), Green, Urban Olive | Depends |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| Vivo vivo X300 E | Vivo vivo X300 FE | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.6 in | 6.3 in |
| Peak brightness | 5000 nits | 5000 nits |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Pixel density | 459 ppi | 461 ppi |
| Display type | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
Battery4▾
| Vivo vivo X300 E | Vivo vivo X300 FE | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 7200 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 90 W | 90 W |
| Wireless charging power | — | 40 W |
| Wireless charging | — | ✓ |
Performance4▾
| Vivo vivo X300 E | Vivo vivo X300 FE | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
Camera2▾
| Vivo vivo X300 E | Vivo vivo X300 FE | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
Design6▾
| Vivo vivo X300 E | Vivo vivo X300 FE | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 203 g | 190.2 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Length | 157.5 mm | 150.8 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 71.8 mm |
| Colors | White, Gray, Orange | Misty Purple (Lilac Purple), Radiant White, Cool Black (Noir Black), Green, Urban Olive |
Memory1▾
| Vivo vivo X300 E | Vivo vivo X300 FE | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | — | — |
Platform1▾
| Vivo vivo X300 E | Vivo vivo X300 FE | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
Features2▾
| Vivo vivo X300 E | Vivo vivo X300 FE | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | — | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | ✓ | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Vivo vivo X300 E or Vivo vivo X300 FE?
Vivo vivo X300 FE edges ahead 43 to 41 and leads in Design. Choose Vivo vivo X300 E instead if Screen size matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (6.6 in vs 6.3 in) · Refresh rate (144 Hz vs 120 Hz) · Pixel density (459 ppi vs 461 ppi).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 25 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.