Vivo vivo X300 FE vs vivo X300 Pro
Vivo vivo X300 FE — Pick the Vivo vivo X300 FE — it leads these groups: Design 3
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Vivo vivo X300 FE wins this comparison with a score of 45/100, ahead of vivo X300 Pro (37).
The main differences: Screen size (6.3 in vs 6.8 in) · Display type (LTPO AMOLED vs 全面屏（中置挖孔屏），直面屏) · Battery capacity (6500 mAh vs 6510 mAh).
Scores are computed from 26 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Vivo vivo X300 FE if you care about…
- Wireless charging ✓ vs —
- Weight 190.2 g +35.8 g vs 226 g
- Length 150.8 mm +11.2 mm vs 162.0 mm
- Width 71.8 mm +3.7 mm vs 75.5 mm
Pick the vivo X300 Pro if you care about…
- Screen size 6.8 in +0.5 in vs 6.3 in
- Battery capacity 6510 mAh +10 mAh vs 6500 mAh
- Thickness 8.0 mm +0.2 mm vs 8.2 mm
- Face unlock ✓ vs —
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
OnePlus 13
OnePlus 15
vivo X Fold6
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 10a
Where they differ
11 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Vivo vivo X300 FE | vivo X300 Pro | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.3 in | 6.8 in | vivo X300 Pro |
| Display type | LTPO AMOLED | 全面屏（中置挖孔屏），直面屏 | Depends |
| Battery capacity | 6500 mAh | 6510 mAh | vivo X300 Pro |
| Wireless charging | ✓ | — | Vivo vivo X300 FE |
| OS | Android 16 | OriginOS 6 | Depends |
| Weight | 190.2 g | 226 g | Vivo vivo X300 FE |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.0 mm | vivo X300 Pro |
| Length | 150.8 mm | 162.0 mm | Vivo vivo X300 FE |
| Width | 71.8 mm | 75.5 mm | Vivo vivo X300 FE |
| Colors | Misty Purple (Lilac Purple), Radiant White, Cool Black (Noir Black), Green, Urban Olive | 纯粹黑，简单白，自在蓝，旷野棕 查看外观 | Depends |
| Face unlock | — | ✓ | vivo X300 Pro |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| Vivo vivo X300 FE | vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.3 in | 6.8 in |
| Peak brightness | 5000 nits | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Pixel density | 461 ppi | — |
| Display type | LTPO AMOLED | 全面屏（中置挖孔屏），直面屏 |
Battery4▾
| Vivo vivo X300 FE | vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 6500 mAh | 6510 mAh |
| Wired charging | 90 W | 90 W |
| Wireless charging power | 40 W | — |
| Wireless charging | ✓ | — |
Performance4▾
| Vivo vivo X300 FE | vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 12 GB | — |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | — |
| OS | Android 16 | OriginOS 6 |
| Storage | 256 GB | — |
Camera2▾
| Vivo vivo X300 FE | vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | — |
Design7▾
| Vivo vivo X300 FE | vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 190.2 g | 226 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.0 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | ✓ | — |
| Length | 150.8 mm | 162.0 mm |
| Width | 71.8 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Colors | Misty Purple (Lilac Purple), Radiant White, Cool Black (Noir Black), Green, Urban Olive | 纯粹黑，简单白，自在蓝，旷野棕 查看外观 |
| Body material | — | 铝合金中框，玻璃后壳 查看外观图 |
Memory1▾
| Vivo vivo X300 FE | vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | — | — |
Platform1▾
| Vivo vivo X300 FE | vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
Features2▾
| Vivo vivo X300 FE | vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | — | ✓ |
| Fingerprint sensor | ✓ | — |
FAQ
Which is better, Vivo vivo X300 FE or vivo X300 Pro?
Vivo vivo X300 FE has the higher overall score (45 vs 37) and leads in Design. Choose vivo X300 Pro instead if Screen size matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (6.3 in vs 6.8 in) · Display type (LTPO AMOLED vs 全面屏（中置挖孔屏），直面屏) · Battery capacity (6500 mAh vs 6510 mAh).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 26 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.