Xiaomi 15 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17
Xiaomi 17 — Pick the Xiaomi 17 — it leads these groups: Design 4 Battery 3
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Xiaomi 17 wins this comparison with a score of 44/100, ahead of Xiaomi 15 Ultra (40).
The main differences: Screen size (6.7 in vs 6.3 in) · Display type (AMOLED vs LTPO AMOLED) · Battery capacity (6000 mAh vs 6330 mAh).
Scores are computed from 26 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Xiaomi 15 Ultra if you care about…
- Screen size 6.7 in +0.4 in vs 6.3 in
- Wireless charging power 80 W +30 W vs 50 W
- RAM 16 GB +4 GB vs 12 GB
- Face unlock ✓ vs —
Pick the Xiaomi 17 if you care about…
- Battery capacity 6330 mAh +330 mAh vs 6000 mAh
- Wired charging 100 W +10 W vs 90 W
- Wireless charging ✓ vs —
- Weight 191 g +35 g vs 226 g
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
vivo X Fold6
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 10a
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Where they differ
15 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Xiaomi 15 Ultra | Xiaomi 17 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 in | 6.3 in | Xiaomi 15 Ultra |
| Display type | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED | Depends |
| Battery capacity | 6000 mAh | 6330 mAh | Xiaomi 17 |
| Wired charging | 90 W | 100 W | Xiaomi 17 |
| Wireless charging power | 80 W | 50 W | Xiaomi 15 Ultra |
| Wireless charging | — | ✓ | Xiaomi 17 |
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB | Xiaomi 15 Ultra |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Depends |
| OS | Xiaomi HyperOS 2 | Android 16 | Depends |
| Weight | 226 g | 191 g | Xiaomi 17 |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm | 8.1 mm | Xiaomi 17 |
| Length | 161.3 mm | 151.1 mm | Xiaomi 17 |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 71.8 mm | Xiaomi 17 |
| Colors | 白色，黑色，松柏绿，经典黑银 查看外观 | Black, Venture Green, Alpine Pink, Ice Blue, White | Depends |
| Face unlock | ✓ | — | Xiaomi 15 Ultra |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| Xiaomi 15 Ultra | Xiaomi 17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 in | 6.3 in |
| Peak brightness | — | 3500 nits |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Pixel density | — | 460 ppi |
| Display type | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
Battery4▾
| Xiaomi 15 Ultra | Xiaomi 17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 6000 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Wired charging | 90 W | 100 W |
| Wireless charging power | 80 W | 50 W |
| Wireless charging | — | ✓ |
Performance5▾
| Xiaomi 15 Ultra | Xiaomi 17 | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| OS | Xiaomi HyperOS 2 | Android 16 |
| Storage | — | 256 GB |
| AnTuTu 11 score | — | 3404616 |
Camera2▾
| Xiaomi 15 Ultra | Xiaomi 17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | — | 50 MP |
| Selfie camera | — | 50 MP |
Design6▾
| Xiaomi 15 Ultra | Xiaomi 17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 226 g | 191 g |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | — | ✓ |
| Length | 161.3 mm | 151.1 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 71.8 mm |
| Colors | 白色，黑色，松柏绿，经典黑银 查看外观 | Black, Venture Green, Alpine Pink, Ice Blue, White |
Memory1▾
| Xiaomi 15 Ultra | Xiaomi 17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | — | — |
Platform1▾
| Xiaomi 15 Ultra | Xiaomi 17 | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
Features2▾
| Xiaomi 15 Ultra | Xiaomi 17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | ✓ | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena · Manufacturer
FAQ
Which is better, Xiaomi 15 Ultra or Xiaomi 17?
Xiaomi 17 has the higher overall score (44 vs 40) and leads in Design, Battery. Choose Xiaomi 15 Ultra instead if Screen size matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (6.7 in vs 6.3 in) · Display type (AMOLED vs LTPO AMOLED) · Battery capacity (6000 mAh vs 6330 mAh).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 26 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.