Xiaomi 18 Fold vs Xiaomi 18 Pro
Xiaomi 18 Pro — Pick the Xiaomi 18 Pro — it leads these groups: Battery 3 Design 3 Camera 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Xiaomi 18 Pro wins this comparison with a score of 48/100, ahead of Xiaomi 18 Fold (47).
The main differences: Screen size (7.6 in vs 6.4 in) · Pixel density (382 ppi vs 419 ppi) · Battery capacity (5100 mAh vs 7000 mAh).
Scores are computed from 26 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Xiaomi 18 Fold if you care about…
- Screen size 7.6 in +1.2 in vs 6.4 in
- Thickness 5 mm +3.5 mm vs 8.5 mm
- Face unlock ✓ vs —
Pick the Xiaomi 18 Pro if you care about…
- Pixel density 419 ppi +37 ppi vs 382 ppi
- Battery capacity 7000 mAh +1900 mAh vs 5100 mAh
- Wired charging 100 W +33 W vs 67 W
- Wireless charging ✓ vs —
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
vivo X Fold6
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 10a
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Where they differ
14 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Xiaomi 18 Fold | Xiaomi 18 Pro | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7.6 in | 6.4 in | Xiaomi 18 Fold |
| Pixel density | 382 ppi | 419 ppi | Xiaomi 18 Pro |
| Battery capacity | 5100 mAh | 7000 mAh | Xiaomi 18 Pro |
| Wired charging | 67 W | 100 W | Xiaomi 18 Pro |
| Wireless charging | — | ✓ | Xiaomi 18 Pro |
| Chipset | XRing O3 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 | Depends |
| OS | Xiaomi HyperOS | Android 17 | Depends |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 50 MP | Xiaomi 18 Pro |
| Weight | 226 g | 208 g | Xiaomi 18 Pro |
| Thickness | 5 mm | 8.5 mm | Xiaomi 18 Fold |
| Length | 163.8 mm | 151.8 mm | Xiaomi 18 Pro |
| Width | 117.8 mm | 72 mm | Xiaomi 18 Pro |
| Colors | 暖金白，黑色，西野红 查看外观 | Black, White, Pink, Red, Blue | Depends |
| Face unlock | ✓ | — | Xiaomi 18 Fold |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| Xiaomi 18 Fold | Xiaomi 18 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7.6 in | 6.4 in |
| Peak brightness | 4000 nits | 4000 nits |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Pixel density | 382 ppi | 419 ppi |
| Display type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
Battery4▾
| Xiaomi 18 Fold | Xiaomi 18 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 5100 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 67 W | 100 W |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | 50 W |
| Wireless charging | — | ✓ |
Performance4▾
| Xiaomi 18 Fold | Xiaomi 18 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Chipset | XRing O3 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 |
| OS | Xiaomi HyperOS | Android 17 |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
Camera2▾
| Xiaomi 18 Fold | Xiaomi 18 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 50 MP |
Design7▾
| Xiaomi 18 Fold | Xiaomi 18 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 226 g | 208 g |
| Thickness | 5 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Length | 163.8 mm | 151.8 mm |
| Width | 117.8 mm | 72 mm |
| Colors | 暖金白，黑色，西野红 查看外观 | Black, White, Pink, Red, Blue |
| Body material | 弧型水滴金属中框 查看外观图 | — |
Memory1▾
| Xiaomi 18 Fold | Xiaomi 18 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | — | — |
Platform1▾
| Xiaomi 18 Fold | Xiaomi 18 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
Features2▾
| Xiaomi 18 Fold | Xiaomi 18 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | ✓ | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | ✓ | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Xiaomi 18 Fold or Xiaomi 18 Pro?
Xiaomi 18 Pro edges ahead 48 to 47 and leads in Battery, Design, Camera. Choose Xiaomi 18 Fold instead if Screen size matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (7.6 in vs 6.4 in) · Pixel density (382 ppi vs 419 ppi) · Battery capacity (5100 mAh vs 7000 mAh).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 26 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.