Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro
Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro — Pick the Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro — it leads these groups: Design 4 Display 2 Battery 2
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro wins this comparison with a score of 51/100, ahead of Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro (38).
The main differences: Screen size (6.9 in vs 6.6 in) · Refresh rate (120 Hz vs 185 Hz) · Pixel density (254 ppi vs 419 ppi).
Scores are computed from 26 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro if you care about…
- Screen size 6.9 in +0.3 in vs 6.6 in
- Battery capacity 7500 mAh +1170 mAh vs 6330 mAh
- Memory card slot ✓ vs —
Pick the Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro if you care about…
- Refresh rate 185 Hz +65 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Pixel density 419 ppi +165 ppi vs 254 ppi
- Wired charging 100 W +55 W vs 45 W
- Wireless charging ✓ vs —
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
Where they differ
18 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 in | 6.6 in | Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 185 Hz | Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro |
| Pixel density | 254 ppi | 419 ppi | Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro |
| Display type | IPS LCD | AMOLED | Depends |
| Battery capacity | 7500 mAh | 6330 mAh | Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 100 W | Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro |
| Wireless charging | — | ✓ | Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro |
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB | Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro |
| Chipset | Helio G91 Ultra | Snapdragon 8 Elite V Series Gen 5 | Depends |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB | Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro |
| Weight | 232 g | 206 g | Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro |
| Water resistant (IP68) | — | ✓ | Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro |
| Length | 170.1 mm | 157.5 mm | Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro |
| Width | 78.4 mm | 75.3 mm | Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro |
| Colors | Green, Blue, Black | Black, White, Aurora Green | Depends |
| Memory card slot | ✓ | — | Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 in | 6.6 in |
| Peak brightness | — | 4500 nits |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 185 Hz |
| Pixel density | 254 ppi | 419 ppi |
| Display type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
Battery4▾
| Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 7500 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 100 W |
| Wireless charging power | — | 50 W |
| Wireless charging | — | ✓ |
Performance5▾
| Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Chipset | Helio G91 Ultra | Snapdragon 8 Elite V Series Gen 5 |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| AnTuTu 11 score | — | 3228426 |
Camera2▾
| Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
Design6▾
| Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 232 g | 206 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | — | ✓ |
| Length | 170.1 mm | 157.5 mm |
| Width | 78.4 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Colors | Green, Blue, Black | Black, White, Aurora Green |
Memory1▾
| Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | ✓ | — |
Platform1▾
| Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
Features2▾
| Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | — | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | ✓ | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro or Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro?
Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro has the higher overall score (51 vs 38) and leads in Design, Display, Battery. Choose Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro instead if Screen size matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (6.9 in vs 6.6 in) · Refresh rate (120 Hz vs 185 Hz) · Pixel density (254 ppi vs 419 ppi).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 26 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.
OnePlus 13
OnePlus 15
vivo X Fold6