EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro

🏆 Settled

Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro — Pick the Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro — it leads these groups: Design 4 Display 2 Battery 2

Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public

The short answer

Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro wins this comparison with a score of 51/100, ahead of Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro (38).

The main differences: Screen size (6.9 in vs 6.6 in) · Refresh rate (120 Hz vs 185 Hz) · Pixel density (254 ppi vs 419 ppi).

Scores are computed from 26 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro

Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro

Xiaomi
38score / 100
3 wins · 19 tied
🏆 Overall winner Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro

Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro

Xiaomi
51score / 100
12 wins · 10 tied

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

Xiaomi Poco C95 ProXiaomi Poco F9 Pro
Display 26 52
Battery 32 57
Performance 35 65
Camera 17 83
Design 39 66
Memory 100 0
Platform 17 17
Features 50 50

How to choose

Pick the Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro if you care about…

  • Screen size 6.9 in +0.3 in vs 6.6 in
  • Battery capacity 7500 mAh +1170 mAh vs 6330 mAh
  • Memory card slot ✓ vs —

Pick the Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro if you care about…

  • Refresh rate 185 Hz +65 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Pixel density 419 ppi +165 ppi vs 254 ppi
  • Wired charging 100 W +55 W vs 45 W
  • Wireless charging ✓ vs —

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

18 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

Xiaomi Poco C95 ProXiaomi Poco F9 ProWhere they differ
Screen size 6.9 in6.6 in Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro
Refresh rate 120 Hz185 Hz Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro
Pixel density 254 ppi419 ppi Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro
Display type IPS LCDAMOLED Depends
Battery capacity 7500 mAh6330 mAh Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro
Wired charging 45 W100 W Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro
Wireless charging —✓ Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro
RAM 6 GB12 GB Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro
Chipset Helio G91 UltraSnapdragon 8 Elite V Series Gen 5 Depends
Storage 128 GB256 GB Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro
Main camera 50 MP200 MP Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro
Selfie camera 8 MP32 MP Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro
Weight 232 g206 g Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro
Water resistant (IP68) —✓ Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro
Length 170.1 mm157.5 mm Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro
Width 78.4 mm75.3 mm Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro
Colors Green, Blue, BlackBlack, White, Aurora Green Depends
Memory card slot ✓— Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Display5▾
Xiaomi Poco C95 ProXiaomi Poco F9 Pro
Screen size 6.9 in 6.6 in
Peak brightness — 4500 nits
Refresh rate 120 Hz 185 Hz
Pixel density 254 ppi 419 ppi
Display type IPS LCD AMOLED
Battery4▾
Xiaomi Poco C95 ProXiaomi Poco F9 Pro
Battery capacity 7500 mAh 6330 mAh
Wired charging 45 W 100 W
Wireless charging power — 50 W
Wireless charging — ✓
Performance5▾
Xiaomi Poco C95 ProXiaomi Poco F9 Pro
RAM 6 GB 12 GB
Chipset Helio G91 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite V Series Gen 5
OS Android 16 Android 16
Storage 128 GB 256 GB
AnTuTu 11 score — 3228426
Camera2▾
Xiaomi Poco C95 ProXiaomi Poco F9 Pro
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Selfie camera 8 MP 32 MP
Design6▾
Xiaomi Poco C95 ProXiaomi Poco F9 Pro
Weight 232 g 206 g
Thickness 8.8 mm 8.8 mm
Water resistant (IP68) — ✓
Length 170.1 mm 157.5 mm
Width 78.4 mm 75.3 mm
Colors Green, Blue, Black Black, White, Aurora Green
Memory1▾
Xiaomi Poco C95 ProXiaomi Poco F9 Pro
Memory card slot ✓ —
Platform1▾
Xiaomi Poco C95 ProXiaomi Poco F9 Pro
CPU cores 8 8
Features2▾
Xiaomi Poco C95 ProXiaomi Poco F9 Pro
Face unlock — —
Fingerprint sensor ✓ ✓

Data sources: GSMArena

FAQ

Which is better, Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro or Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro?

Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro has the higher overall score (51 vs 38) and leads in Design, Display, Battery. Choose Xiaomi Poco C95 Pro instead if Screen size matters more to you.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Screen size (6.9 in vs 6.6 in) · Refresh rate (120 Hz vs 185 Hz) · Pixel density (254 ppi vs 419 ppi).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 26 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.