EN
Tech →
Computing →
Audio & Video →
Smart Home →
Skincare →
Cities & Places →

Xiaomi Redmi K100 Pro Max vs Redmi Redmi K90

🏆 Settled

Xiaomi Redmi K100 Pro Max — Pick the Xiaomi Redmi K100 Pro Max — it leads these groups: Display 2 Battery 1 Performance 1

Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public

The short answer

Xiaomi Redmi K100 Pro Max wins this comparison with a score of 53/100, ahead of Redmi Redmi K90 (37).

The main differences: Screen size (6.9 in vs 6.6 in) · Refresh rate (185 Hz vs 120 Hz) · Display type (AMOLED vs OLED).

Scores are computed from 26 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.

🏆 Overall winner Xiaomi Redmi K100 Pro Max

Xiaomi Redmi K100 Pro Max

Xiaomi
53score / 100
4 wins · 18 tied
Redmi Redmi K90

Redmi Redmi K90

Xiaomi
37score / 100
5 wins · 17 tied

At a glance

0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details

Xiaomi Redmi K100 Pro MaxRedmi Redmi K90
Display 53 36
Battery 68 37
Performance 70 47
Camera 83 20
Design 59 68
Platform 17 17
Features 50 68

How to choose

Pick the Xiaomi Redmi K100 Pro Max if you care about…

  • Screen size 6.9 in +0.3 in vs 6.6 in
  • Refresh rate 185 Hz +65 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Battery capacity 9070 mAh +1970 mAh vs 7100 mAh
  • AnTuTu 11 score 3722803 +596309 vs 3126494

Pick the Redmi Redmi K90 if you care about…

  • Weight 206 g +32 g vs 238 g
  • Thickness 8 mm +0.5 mm vs 8.5 mm
  • Length 157.5 mm +6.0 mm vs 163.5 mm
  • Width 75.2 mm +2.8 mm vs 78 mm

Best price now

Cheap alternatives

Where they differ

13 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row

Xiaomi Redmi K100 Pro MaxRedmi Redmi K90Where they differ
Screen size 6.9 in6.6 in Xiaomi Redmi K100 Pro Max
Refresh rate 185 Hz120 Hz Xiaomi Redmi K100 Pro Max
Display type AMOLEDOLED Depends
Battery capacity 9070 mAh7100 mAh Xiaomi Redmi K100 Pro Max
Chipset Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5Snapdragon 8 Elite Depends
OS Android 16Xiaomi HyperOS 3 Depends
AnTuTu 11 score 37228033126494 Xiaomi Redmi K100 Pro Max
Weight 238 g206 g Redmi Redmi K90
Thickness 8.5 mm8 mm Redmi Redmi K90
Length 163.5 mm157.5 mm Redmi Redmi K90
Width 78 mm75.2 mm Redmi Redmi K90
Colors Black, White, Blue, Red (Burgundy)白色,黑色,水蓝色,浅紫色 Depends
Face unlock —✓ Redmi Redmi K90

The record

Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold

Display5▾
Xiaomi Redmi K100 Pro MaxRedmi Redmi K90
Screen size 6.9 in 6.6 in
Peak brightness 4500 nits —
Refresh rate 185 Hz 120 Hz
Pixel density 416 ppi —
Display type AMOLED OLED
Battery4▾
Xiaomi Redmi K100 Pro MaxRedmi Redmi K90
Battery capacity 9070 mAh 7100 mAh
Wired charging 100 W 100 W
Wireless charging power 50 W —
Wireless charging ✓ —
Performance5▾
Xiaomi Redmi K100 Pro MaxRedmi Redmi K90
RAM 12 GB —
Chipset Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Snapdragon 8 Elite
OS Android 16 Xiaomi HyperOS 3
Storage 256 GB —
AnTuTu 11 score 3722803 3126494
Camera2▾
Xiaomi Redmi K100 Pro MaxRedmi Redmi K90
Main camera 200 MP —
Selfie camera 32 MP —
Design6▾
Xiaomi Redmi K100 Pro MaxRedmi Redmi K90
Weight 238 g 206 g
Thickness 8.5 mm 8 mm
Water resistant (IP68) ✓ —
Length 163.5 mm 157.5 mm
Width 78 mm 75.2 mm
Colors Black, White, Blue, Red (Burgundy) 白色,黑色,水蓝色,浅紫色
Memory1▾
Xiaomi Redmi K100 Pro MaxRedmi Redmi K90
Memory card slot — —
Platform1▾
Xiaomi Redmi K100 Pro MaxRedmi Redmi K90
CPU cores 8 —
Features2▾
Xiaomi Redmi K100 Pro MaxRedmi Redmi K90
Face unlock — ✓
Fingerprint sensor ✓ —

Data sources: GSMArena

FAQ

Which is better, Xiaomi Redmi K100 Pro Max or Redmi Redmi K90?

Xiaomi Redmi K100 Pro Max has the higher overall score (53 vs 37) and leads in Display, Battery, Performance. Choose Redmi Redmi K90 instead if Weight matters more to you.

What are the main differences?

The main differences: Screen size (6.9 in vs 6.6 in) · Refresh rate (185 Hz vs 120 Hz) · Display type (AMOLED vs OLED).

How are the scores calculated?

We normalize 26 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.