Redmi Redmi K90 vs Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max
Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max — Pick the Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max — it leads these groups: Display 2 Battery 1 Performance 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max wins this comparison with a score of 39/100, ahead of Redmi Redmi K90 (38).
The main differences: Screen size (6.6 in vs 6.8 in) · Refresh rate (120 Hz vs 165 Hz) · Display type (OLED vs AMOLED).
Scores are computed from 25 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Redmi Redmi K90 if you care about…
- Weight 206 g +21 g vs 227 g
- Thickness 8 mm +0.2 mm vs 8.2 mm
- Length 157.5 mm +5.4 mm vs 162.9 mm
- Width 75.2 mm +2.7 mm vs 77.9 mm
Pick the Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max if you care about…
- Screen size 6.8 in +0.2 in vs 6.6 in
- Refresh rate 165 Hz +45 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Battery capacity 8550 mAh +1450 mAh vs 7100 mAh
- AnTuTu 11 score 3760662 +634168 vs 3126494
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
vivo X Fold6
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 10a
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Where they differ
13 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Redmi Redmi K90 | Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.6 in | 6.8 in | Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max |
| Display type | OLED | AMOLED | Depends |
| Battery capacity | 7100 mAh | 8550 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Dimensity 9500 | Depends |
| OS | Xiaomi HyperOS 3 | Android 16 | Depends |
| AnTuTu 11 score | 3126494 | 3760662 | Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max |
| Weight | 206 g | 227 g | Redmi Redmi K90 |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.2 mm | Redmi Redmi K90 |
| Length | 157.5 mm | 162.9 mm | Redmi Redmi K90 |
| Width | 75.2 mm | 77.9 mm | Redmi Redmi K90 |
| Colors | 白色，黑色，水蓝色，浅紫色 | Silver, Blue, Black | Depends |
| Face unlock | ✓ | — | Redmi Redmi K90 |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| Redmi Redmi K90 | Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.6 in | 6.8 in |
| Peak brightness | — | 3500 nits |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Pixel density | — | 447 ppi |
| Display type | OLED | AMOLED |
Battery3▾
| Redmi Redmi K90 | Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 7100 mAh | 8550 mAh |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 100 W |
| Wireless charging | — | — |
Performance5▾
| Redmi Redmi K90 | Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | — | 12 GB |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Dimensity 9500 |
| OS | Xiaomi HyperOS 3 | Android 16 |
| Storage | — | 256 GB |
| AnTuTu 11 score | 3126494 | 3760662 |
Camera2▾
| Redmi Redmi K90 | Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | — | 50 MP |
| Selfie camera | — | 20 MP |
Design6▾
| Redmi Redmi K90 | Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 206 g | 227 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | — | ✓ |
| Length | 157.5 mm | 162.9 mm |
| Width | 75.2 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Colors | 白色，黑色，水蓝色，浅紫色 | Silver, Blue, Black |
Memory1▾
| Redmi Redmi K90 | Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | — | — |
Platform1▾
| Redmi Redmi K90 | Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
Features2▾
| Redmi Redmi K90 | Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | ✓ | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Redmi Redmi K90 or Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max?
Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max edges ahead 39 to 38 and leads in Display, Battery, Performance. Choose Redmi Redmi K90 instead if Weight matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (6.6 in vs 6.8 in) · Refresh rate (120 Hz vs 165 Hz) · Display type (OLED vs AMOLED).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 25 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.