Xiaomi Redmi M100 vs Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro
Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro — Pick the Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro — it leads these groups: Design 4 Features 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro wins this comparison with a score of 39/100, ahead of Xiaomi Redmi M100 (23).
The main differences: Screen size (6.9 in vs 6.8 in) · Display type (IPS LCD vs Full screen (center punch-hole), flat) · Battery capacity (7900 mAh vs 7000 mAh).
Scores are computed from 25 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Xiaomi Redmi M100 if you care about…
- Screen size 6.9 in +0.1 in vs 6.8 in
- Battery capacity 7900 mAh +900 mAh vs 7000 mAh
Pick the Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro if you care about…
- Weight 210.6 g +21.4 g vs 232 g
- Thickness 7.8 mm +1.0 mm vs 8.8 mm
- Length 163.6 mm +6.5 mm vs 170.1 mm
- Width 78.1 mm +0.3 mm vs 78.4 mm
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
OnePlus 13
OnePlus 15
vivo X Fold6
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 10a
Where they differ
10 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Xiaomi Redmi M100 | Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 in | 6.8 in | Xiaomi Redmi M100 |
| Display type | IPS LCD | Full screen (center punch-hole), flat | Depends |
| Battery capacity | 7900 mAh | 7000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi M100 |
| OS | Android 16 | Xiaomi HyperOS 2 | Depends |
| Weight | 232 g | 210.6 g | Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 7.8 mm | Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro |
| Length | 170.1 mm | 163.6 mm | Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro |
| Width | 78.4 mm | 78.1 mm | Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro |
| Colors | Black, White, Oak Green | 子夜黑，云霞紫，天青蓝，雪松白 | Depends |
| Face unlock | — | ✓ | Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| Xiaomi Redmi M100 | Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 in | 6.8 in |
| Peak brightness | 825 nits | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Pixel density | 254 ppi | — |
| Display type | IPS LCD | Full screen (center punch-hole), flat |
Battery3▾
| Xiaomi Redmi M100 | Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 7900 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | — |
Performance5▾
| Xiaomi Redmi M100 | Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 6 GB | — |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 4 Gen 5 | — |
| OS | Android 16 | Xiaomi HyperOS 2 |
| Storage | 128 GB | — |
| AnTuTu 11 score | 622466 | — |
Camera2▾
| Xiaomi Redmi M100 | Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 13 MP | — |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | — |
Design6▾
| Xiaomi Redmi M100 | Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 232 g | 210.6 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | — | — |
| Length | 170.1 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 78.4 mm | 78.1 mm |
| Colors | Black, White, Oak Green | 子夜黑，云霞紫，天青蓝，雪松白 |
Memory1▾
| Xiaomi Redmi M100 | Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | — | — |
Platform1▾
| Xiaomi Redmi M100 | Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
Features2▾
| Xiaomi Redmi M100 | Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | — | ✓ |
| Fingerprint sensor | ✓ | — |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Xiaomi Redmi M100 or Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro?
Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro has the higher overall score (39 vs 23) and leads in Design, Features. Choose Xiaomi Redmi M100 instead if Screen size matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (6.9 in vs 6.8 in) · Display type (IPS LCD vs Full screen (center punch-hole), flat) · Battery capacity (7900 mAh vs 7000 mAh).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 25 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.