Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17
Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro — Pick the Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro — it leads these groups: Design 4 Features 1
Tap a group name to see the proof · The scoring method is public
The short answer
Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro wins this comparison with a score of 40/100, ahead of Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 (37).
The main differences: Screen size (6.8 in vs 7.0 in) · Display type (Full screen (center punch-hole), flat vs AMOLED) · Battery capacity (7000 mAh vs 7700 mAh).
Scores are computed from 25 public spec attributes; missing values stay marked unknown in tables and are imputed at the category median, never passed off as measured.
At a glance
0–100 per group, normalized within the category · Tap a group for details
How to choose
Pick the Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro if you care about…
- Weight 210.6 g +13.4 g vs 224 g
- Thickness 7.8 mm +0.7 mm vs 8.5 mm
- Length 163.6 mm +6.1 mm vs 169.7 mm
- Width 78.1 mm +1.0 mm vs 79.1 mm
Pick the Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 if you care about…
- Screen size 7.0 in +0.2 in vs 6.8 in
- Battery capacity 7700 mAh +700 mAh vs 7000 mAh
- Memory card slot ✓ vs —
Best price now
Cheap alternatives
vivo X Fold6
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 10a
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Where they differ
11 · Only rows that actually differ, with a verdict per row
| Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro | Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 | Where they differ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.8 in | 7.0 in | Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 |
| Display type | Full screen (center punch-hole), flat | AMOLED | Depends |
| Battery capacity | 7000 mAh | 7700 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 |
| OS | Xiaomi HyperOS 2 | Android 16 | Depends |
| Weight | 210.6 g | 224 g | Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.5 mm | Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro |
| Length | 163.6 mm | 169.7 mm | Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro |
| Width | 78.1 mm | 79.1 mm | Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro |
| Colors | 子夜黑，云霞紫，天青蓝，雪松白 | Celestial Purple, Sky Teal, Black | Depends |
| Memory card slot | — | ✓ | Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 |
| Face unlock | ✓ | — | Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro |
The record
Grouped and collapsible · Tap a group to fold
Display5▾
| Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro | Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.8 in | 7.0 in |
| Peak brightness | — | 1800 nits |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Pixel density | — | 375 ppi |
| Display type | Full screen (center punch-hole), flat | AMOLED |
Battery3▾
| Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro | Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 7000 mAh | 7700 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | — |
Performance5▾
| Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro | Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | — | 4 GB |
| Chipset | — | Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 |
| OS | Xiaomi HyperOS 2 | Android 16 |
| Storage | — | 128 GB |
| AnTuTu 11 score | — | 593849 |
Camera2▾
| Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro | Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | — | 50 MP |
| Selfie camera | — | 16 MP |
Design6▾
| Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro | Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 210.6 g | 224 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Water resistant (IP68) | — | ✓ |
| Length | 163.6 mm | 169.7 mm |
| Width | 78.1 mm | 79.1 mm |
| Colors | 子夜黑，云霞紫，天青蓝，雪松白 | Celestial Purple, Sky Teal, Black |
Memory1▾
| Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro | Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory card slot | — | ✓ |
Platform1▾
| Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro | Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 | |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
Features2▾
| Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro | Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Face unlock | ✓ | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | ✓ |
Data sources: GSMArena
FAQ
Which is better, Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro or Xiaomi Redmi Note 17?
Redmi Redmi Note 15 Pro has the higher overall score (40 vs 37) and leads in Design, Features. Choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 instead if Screen size matters more to you.
What are the main differences?
The main differences: Screen size (6.8 in vs 7.0 in) · Display type (Full screen (center punch-hole), flat vs AMOLED) · Battery capacity (7000 mAh vs 7700 mAh).
How are the scores calculated?
We normalize 25 public spec attributes within the category and weight them by group into a 0–100 score; missing values are inherited from spec-identical twins or imputed at the category median, so a sparse spec sheet never earns an advantage. The methodology is public.